Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clawrence3; azhenfud
"Were you against Carter's 'amnesty' for draft-dodgers and deserters?

This is an "apples and oranges" comparison, since the daft-dodgers were American citizens from the get-go. But the answer to your question is "yes". I served. They can serve. Or leave and stay gone. No free lunch for cowardice.

"What if part of this 'amnesty' requires everyone to get in line AFTER those already seeking legal status the right way?"

I oppose amnesty under any and all conditions. No reward for breaking the law. Is that really so hard to understand?

By the way, you can stop putting the word "amnesty" in quotes, because amnesty is what is being discussed here. Any pretense otherwise is pure sophism.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

863 posted on 04/06/2006 11:47:45 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Brower

O.K., how about "amnesty with added paperwork" then? Would that make you happy? Probably not, because you really seem so upset about "BREAKING THE LAW" - would you be as upset if the feds and States suddently repealed the speed limit and a bunch of WHITE people, who had pending speeding tickets, got amnesty (with or without paperwork)?


948 posted on 04/06/2006 12:24:26 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson