[clawrence3]

I am opposed to a fence that kept 95 percent out because of the cost, not in principle. The Senate bill(s) deal with those who are ALREADY here. It would also COST TO MUCH to deport 20 million. I would rather see those resources go to, you know, actually catching terrorists and real criminals.

P.S. You don;t get to pick today's talking points ; )

[dirtboy]

I am opposed to a fence that kept 95 percent out because of the cost, not in principle.

Hey, illegals cost us billions of dollars a year in taxpayer subsidies for services they consume. A fence would be cost-effective.

But cost really isn't the issue, is it? After all, you said you were for the Senate bill and against terrorists entering the country. A fence would help keep terrorists out and the Senate bill would make it easier for them to come in. So, once again, what you claim and what you debate are two very different things.

[inquest]

I am opposed to a fence that kept 95 percent out because of the cost, not in principle.

The cost would be minimal, as has already been explained to you.