IIRC, that isn't correct. He did better with the hispanic vote than typical republicans, but only in states that were already solidly in the GOP camp anyway.
Twelve million unemployable hispanics are not going to vote for a fiscal conservative party.
Yes, straight, concise and to the point. And the kids of these people, who have watched their fathers work long and hard for little are not going to grow up and become Conservatives. They are going to be angry at the gringo and easily radicalized--especially if they make into our university system.
I agree Bush did the best with Hispanic men (why do you think George P. is being groomed) and in the South. There are some conflicting exit poll data, but TV network-Associated Press national exit poll taken on Election Day gave Bush 44 percent of their votes, compared to 35 percent overall in 2000 - that's nothing to sneeze at: http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/naes/2004_03_hispanic-data-12_21_pr.pdf
I can write a book on how the 86 amnesty bill was the driving force behind the transofmration of California from being a moderate-conservative state in the mid 80s that was trending GOP to being a now solidly liberal state. I can even draw charts and maps on how the demographic changes drove the political changes.
The thing is, the pro illegal immigrant(and pro high level of immigration in general) "conservatives" have no clue when it comes to facts and critical thinking. When all is said and done, the US will be a social democracy, and the most delicious irony is that those who will complain the most about extreme levels of taxation will be those who supported open borders. When their time comes, and their time will come, I will not shead a tear.
Don't waste your time with these Qusilings cause most want a Hispanic majority here anyhow....guess why some do?
Duh.
They want to be the majority....