To: Quark2005; WKB
I don't look at these chapters as attempt of God to explain the sequence of natural history, but rather as divinely inspired poetry that conveys a message of the strength of God's creative power.A good exposition of this thesis:
127 posted on
03/30/2006 10:46:54 AM PST by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: Quark2005
Specifically Hyers argues that Genesis 1 & 2 is principally a polemic against the surrounding polytheistic cultures. The point isn't chronology, science, etc, but rather emphasizing that stars, planets, sun, moon etc are created things; not gods or some other sort of divine, sacred entities as in the polytheistic scheme.
128 posted on
03/30/2006 10:54:55 AM PST by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: Stultis
Looks like a good read. (Usually I glance at references made to books on FR and move on, but this actually looks fascinating to me). Do you recommend it?
129 posted on
03/30/2006 10:56:59 AM PST by
Quark2005
(Confidence follows from consilience.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson