Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Sale .... The New Jersey Turnpike?
Millennium Radio ^ | Friday, March 24, 2006 | Kevin McArdle

Posted on 03/24/2006 5:34:34 AM PST by Calpernia

State Senator Ray Lesniak thinks allowing the New Jersey Turnpike Authority to sell off a portion of the state's toll roads would produce a huge windfall and annual savings for years to some. He doesn't, however think any potential cash from the sale should be used to stave off Governor Jon Corzine's one-cent state sales tax proposal.

A bill Lesniak is set to introduce a bill that would, "allow the sale of 49% of the Turnpike Authority retaining control for the State of New Jersey." The Senator claims financial experts have told him that by doing so the state will be, "raising $6 billion so that we could shore up our pension and earn hundreds of millions of dollars a year in revenue because we eliminated that (pension fund) deficit."

"Because we control interest," says Lesniak, "we could ensure that there will no toll hikes above the rate of inflation (and) that toll roads are properly maintained." He calls his legislation, "A win-win-win."

Lesniak is adamant that any funds raised should not be used to take the Governor's sales tax increase plans off the table, "I think that's a mistake and would be fiscally irresponsible because this is a one-shot revenue."

The measure can't be formally introduced until the State Senate's next quorum call and that doesn't happen until May. Lesniak says, "Even after the introduction, we're looking at about a year before this could actually happen."

"If we sell an interest in the Turnpike," says GOP State Senator Leonard Lance, "we would have to distribute preferred stock and financial analysis indicates that type of preferred stock is considered a form of borrowing." Lance has twice succeeded in lawsuits against democratic administrations to block borrowing without voter approval.

Lance says, "If we sell 49% of the toll roads, 49% of the tolls will be used to pay those who purchased these bonds and we will no longer have these revenues to help fund the toll roads." If the state controls just 51% of the toll roads, is there a guarantee that the 49% of public stockholders would be willing to spend to maintain the roads? Lance says, "There would have to be a contract with the private sector and I'm sure that would be open to negotiation and I am very skeptical of that as well."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: corzine; leonardlance; newjersey; njta; njturnpike; pensionfund; raylesniak; tollroads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Calpernia
Next on the auction block.

What is my bid for this wonderful piece of American Art.

Image hosting by Photobucket

21 posted on 03/24/2006 6:11:16 AM PST by mware (A teacher of geography.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shooter1001

Take our politicians to Egypt in chains and sell!


22 posted on 03/24/2006 6:12:12 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mware

How symbolic.

Repubs for sale or rent...Highest bidder an Arab gent...


23 posted on 03/24/2006 6:13:35 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

They can have it!


24 posted on 03/24/2006 6:13:40 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
After Election day, I had visions of the Commerce Turnpike and the Prudential Parkway

If this goes though, there will be a revenue increase, but it won't be for the state or the benefit of the taxpayers.

Off thread, here's a web site that details Corzine's plan to fight corruption in the state;

Error 401 (sarc/off)
25 posted on 03/24/2006 6:17:34 AM PST by Free_SJersey (South Jersey-the secret state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newcthem
. . . why if we are one of the greatest nations in the world with technology and managements skills which have created the highest standard of living on the globe, do we have to have our ports and highways managed by a third world nation. Sorry but this makes no g-d-damn sense whatsoever.

Sure it does. It's obvious to me that we simply value our "standard of living" more than anything else -- including our security, our financial stability, our civic institutions, etc. If selling off our assets to foreign countries is the only way to maintain this standard of living, then that's exactly what we're going to do.

The Spanish philosopher Jose Ortega y Gassett explained it perfectly in his classic essay, "Revolt of the Masses." He was writing about the civil unrest in Spain in the 1930s in particular, but he was remarkably astute about how the flawed human condition manifested itself in idiotic public policy in democratic societies.

26 posted on 03/24/2006 6:30:45 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Oh goody, another major US asset for some foreigners to buy


27 posted on 03/24/2006 6:32:06 AM PST by dennisw (-Muslim's biggest enemy is the founder of Islam, Muhammad. Muslims are victims of this evil conman-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

PENSIONS....that says it all for me. Always thinking of their pensions.


28 posted on 03/24/2006 6:51:08 AM PST by pandoraou812 ( barbaric with zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
and these idiots were against Bret Schundler's proposal to "lease" not sell some land on the GSP in order to end the tolls. Now look at what they want to do. just another gimmick to substitute for over spending during the democrat McGreevey, Codey and Corzine budgets.
29 posted on 03/24/2006 9:10:05 AM PST by Coleus (What were Ted Kennedy & his nephew doing on Good Friday, 1991? Getting drunk and raping women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newcthem
. . . that under EU rules, the owners were free to charge what ever they pleased.

What EU rules were those, specifically?

30 posted on 03/24/2006 9:12:08 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: newcthem
When the citizens complained about the price increase, they were told that under EU rules, the owners were free to charge what ever they pleased.

Run by the same company that our idiot governor here in Texas wants to give toll roads to. Believe it or not, there are lots of supporters of this on FreeRepublic. 

31 posted on 03/24/2006 12:44:57 PM PST by zeugma (Anybody who says XP is more secure than OS X or Linux has been licking toads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson