Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Go Bush
Creators Syndicate via Townhall.com ^ | March 23, 2006 | Debra Saunders

Posted on 03/23/2006 10:01:31 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

Allow me to explain why I remain among the dwindling numbers of Americans -- about 37 percent, according to the American Research Group -- who approve of the job President Bush is doing.

The death toll of American troops and Iraqis killed by terrorist attacks keeps growing. Voters are fatigued, and Bush is sinking in the opinion polls. Of course it is disheartening to read the casualty numbers every morning, as U.S. troops battle an often invisible enemy that also attacks Iraqis struggling to restore order to their nation.

Antiwar types began calling the situation in Iraq a "quagmire" in the first month of the war. After three years, that term is resonating with the public. It's a fact: This is not a quick, easy war. It has far exceeded the 43-day Persian Gulf War of 1991.

For the record, I do not mean to be critical of war coverage from journalists in Iraq. They are doing the best they can, and their reportage, no doubt, helped reshape military and political strategy for the better. I do, however, object to a Beltway mentality, seen in how Washington journalists report on the politics of the war, which reflects the apparent belief that wars are supposed to go by the book. When television news anchors announce bad news, they usually frame it as a reflection on Bush, not the insurgents.

Or as British Prime Minister Tony Blair put it in a speech this week, insurgency forces "play our own media with a shrewdness that would be the envy of many a political party. Every act of carnage adds to the death toll. But somehow, it serves to indicate our responsibility for disorder, rather than the act of wickedness that causes it. For us, so much of our opinion believes that what was done in Iraq in 2003 was so wrong that it is reluctant to accept what is plainly right now."

Bush does not have the luxury of allowing the bad news to defeat him. Yes, Bush could declare victory and pull out. After all, Saddam Hussein no longer rules. But Bush understands that there can be no victory if Islamic extremists see the United States engage its powerful military, only to bolt when the public gets antsy.

You hear people lamenting about how there is no political leadership anymore. Yet, here it is. Asked at a White House press conference on Tuesday if he thought he had the "political capital" he claimed when he won the 2004 election, Bush answered, "I'd say I'm spending that capital on the war." Indeed, Bush is willing to run his poll numbers into the ground in order to do what he believes he has to do.

Contrast Bush with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who changes his agenda with the wind, not because he is willing to tackle difficult work, but because he needs to score some political points as he prepares to run for re-election. It makes me appreciate the fact that Bush is constant.

Yes, at times Bush drives me crazy, too. His refusal to veto any spending bills fueled a growing deficit. The Bushies were dangerously overconfident about what it would take to win the war in Iraq. They may well have underestimated how many troops were needed in 2003.

This summer, he dropped the ball. He allowed public support for the war to soften. While I think state and local officials carry the blame for infrastructure failures -- a la Katrina -- Bush was flat-footed in responding to the disaster.

Not only will Bush never be as articulate as Blair, he'll never learn how to pronounce "nuclear." Perhaps Bush's biggest political failing has been his inability to get Americans to dislike his critics more than they dislike him -- although I got the feeling Bush was learning the game on Tuesday, when he referred to the National Security Agency wiretap controversy thusly: "I did notice that nobody from the Democratic Party has actually stood up and called for the getting rid of the terrorist surveillance program. You know, if that's what they believe, if people in the party believe that, then they ought to stand up and say it."

Bush nailed it. Since his election, partisan Democrats repeatedly have voted in favor of his proposals -- Iraq, the Patriot Act -- only to snipe at them when they see an opportunity to wound the Republican president. They have every right to criticize policies with which they disagree, but they were not elected to approve a war -- if they weren't willing to do their utmost to win it.

For his part, and with all his faults, the president is trying to do something great. If he succeeds, the world will be a better place. That's what matters.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; iraq

1 posted on 03/23/2006 10:01:32 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

My support for President Bush will not waver, it will not falter, and it will not fail.

I unapologetically adore the man!!

GO 'W' GO!!


2 posted on 03/23/2006 10:15:23 PM PST by Pragmatic Warrior (Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Yeah, call me a Bush bot, but 7 years ago I recall sharing i(in whispered tones) with a friend how I feared a nuke terror incident would cripple our nation and civilization. I was convinced at that time that our government was incapable of doing anything about it.

Now, AQ is crippled and on the run and terror everywhere is on the defensive. Further, our economy is booming with opportunity and our society is free and vibrant. Iraq was a gamble that is already paying off in rearraging the planet, even if the public is understandably confused as to how it has done that and why it was important.


3 posted on 03/23/2006 10:22:57 PM PST by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I love W........


4 posted on 03/23/2006 10:38:58 PM PST by marmar (Pray for our Warriors...they are the greatest there are............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
"Allow me to explain why I remain among the dwindling numbers of Americans -- about 37 percent,"

Difficult to read an article that begins by citing bogus polls.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/includes/postpoll_iraqwar_030606.htm

http://www.anklebitingpundits.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2916&mode=nested&order=1&thold=0

"The death toll of American troops and Iraqis killed by terrorist attacks keeps growing."

Then perhaps we ought to aggressively go after the terrorists and KILL them. US hostile action deaths is at 1824. Iraqi death count is around 35,000, most by terrorist attacks. Historically, these are low numbers for a war.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004615.html
http://web1.whs.osd.mil/mmid/casualty/Death_Rates.pdf

"...an often invisible enemy that also attacks Iraqis struggling to restore order to their nation."

They are not OFTEN invisible...THEY ARE INVISIBLE. Otherwise we would just KILL THEM. They wear no uniform, they defend no country, they hide amongst civilians by terrorizing them and killing them.


"Antiwar types began calling the situation in Iraq a "quagmire" in the first month of the war."

Actually, that began 7 days after the war began. I can not find the quotes at the moment, but they were up on FR this week.

"For the record, I do not mean to be critical of war coverage from journalists in Iraq."

You can be critical of the greatest President the US has ever seen, but you can't or won't be critical of media hacks?

"They are doing the best they can,"
ROTFLMHO!!!

"and their reportage, no doubt, helped reshape military and political strategy for the better."

You honestly believe that hacks from the ENEMEDIA reshaped strategy? ROTFLOL!


"They may well have underestimated how many troops were needed in 2003."

They had the troops they needed.

"While I think state and local officials carry the blame for infrastructure failures -- a la Katrina -- Bush was flat-footed in responding to the disaster."

People need to study up on how our Republican form of government works. I am sick to death of hearing how the President screwed up Katrina. As long as the crooks known as Blank-o, Chocolate Nagin and that Landscrew broad are still in office, don't mention President Bush's name. Those incompetent fools should have been removed from office by Sept. 15th.

More deaths were cause by their incompetence in a few days than troops we lost in any given year of the war.

Other than that.....nice article.

Oh, and the title is mis-leading. You slam President Bush until the last few lines.
5 posted on 03/23/2006 11:16:08 PM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
As I look out the open door that should be our Southern Border, the President's absolute refusal to do anything but make statements that increase the problem, and his out of control spending, have me more than a little upset with him. I can't be convinced that there is a war on terror, so long as the back door is wide open.

There is a war on some terror, I wasn't convinced that we should go into Iraq, but we are there now, we can't cut, and run, we've got to stay until the job is done.

6 posted on 03/23/2006 11:23:13 PM PST by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: c-b 1
This president has killed more ragheads than any Prez in my lifetime.

That alone scores him an A+ in my book.

7 posted on 03/23/2006 11:35:15 PM PST by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
Bush was flat-footed in responding to the disaster."

People need to study up on how our Republican form of government works.

Yes they do!

I am sick to death of hearing how the President screwed up Katrina.

So am I. As I understand the Constitution, it is not the Federal Government's Responsibility. The Federal Government didn't get involoved in disaster relief until the FDR/LBJ Nanny State was implemented.

8 posted on 03/23/2006 11:39:48 PM PST by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I Like Bush! ... actions speak louder than words... and all I keep hearing in the news(???) is words, words, words... come poll me....


9 posted on 03/23/2006 11:53:08 PM PST by schwing_wifey (Lily was mistaken.. The Borg are Swedish...Resistance is Futile.... PST +9hours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
This president has killed more ragheads than any Prez in my lifetime.

That may be, but it doesn't make any sense to me to leave the back door wide open to so their family, and friends, along with anyone else who wants to can waltz right into the country.

I hate to sound like a broken record, but I have been screaming about this mess for over 15 years, now it has become an absolute nightmare, and there are still those who don't take it seriously, including our President.

10 posted on 03/23/2006 11:55:13 PM PST by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Count me in too. They never surveyed me.


11 posted on 03/24/2006 2:09:01 AM PST by ONETWOONE (onetwoone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ONETWOONE

They have a little ask the person on the street secion in our local paper here {Lakeside Ledger}. I do you approve of the job our president is doing? Out of the six people they talked to five said they approved of him and the one left just didn't have an opinion.


12 posted on 03/24/2006 4:19:04 AM PST by southernerwithanattitude ({new and improved redneck})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Ping


13 posted on 03/24/2006 4:49:05 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic Warrior
RE: Post #2

DITTO

BTW, LOL, on your tagline!

14 posted on 03/24/2006 6:58:43 AM PST by Pippin (Pax et Bonum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson