Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex offender sentencing puts judge on hot seat [Judge: Whenever I drink, I break out in handcuffs]
Plain Dealer ^ | Friday, March 17, 2006 | T.C. Brown

Posted on 03/18/2006 6:36:58 AM PST by Diago

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: null and void
He is a perp, IMHO...

And looks like one too ... doesn't he?

41 posted on 03/18/2006 9:28:42 AM PST by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

Ever check out your local Meagan's Law web site?


42 posted on 03/18/2006 9:31:18 AM PST by null and void (Sept 11th: National Moderate Muslim Day of Tacit Approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Diago
I've always wondered why a law couldn't be passed that would make a judge or parole board civilly liable for the actions of people they let off with minimal punishment. In other words, they should be so sure that a criminal will not re-offend that they would be willing to put their fortunes at risk in civil court.
43 posted on 03/18/2006 9:36:47 AM PST by FightThePower!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!
I've always wondered why a law couldn't be passed that would make a judge or parole board civilly liable for the actions of people they let off with minimal punishment. In other words, they should be so sure that a criminal will not re-offend that they would be willing to put their fortunes at risk in civil court.

Because then no one regardless of their contrition, repentance, and resolve to live within the law would ever be released.

Exposing the judge and parole boards to that much liability would hopelessly color their judgment.

I say hopelessly because not of us would have the slightest hope should we be accused of any crime, and none of us are immune from an accusation.

That being said, I think there desperately needs to be a way to introduce some real penalty for judges and parole boards who are way out of line.

44 posted on 03/18/2006 9:49:52 AM PST by null and void (Sept 11th: National Moderate Muslim Day of Tacit Approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: commish
The judge is a liberal weenie alcoholic who didn't have the balls to say no to the agreement and use his power to send the guy to jail, but the deal was made by loser prosecutors who bungled an open & shut case.

While the cased was bungled early on, this states that even with the plea deal the judge could have, and in just about everyone's opinion, should have, sentenced Sleva to five years jail time.

Selva, of nearby Hilliard, pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual battery, which can carry a sentence of up to five years, although jail time is not mandatory.

The judge brought this on himself with his poor judgment, remove him from office.

45 posted on 03/18/2006 9:57:57 AM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

Thanks for your link. I have been following this and had not seen that piece.

While I can see the point the Judge makes, I don't believe it should get him off the hook. He rules supreme in the courtroom, it is his job to know the background of a case especially when dealing with child molesters.

The Judge and the prosecutor had to know one another and I feel that the two of them trying to pass the buck on the other is disingenuous.

The prosecutor should be investigated over his possible misconduct at the very least. The Judge should be off the bench.


46 posted on 03/18/2006 10:00:44 AM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brytani

Bundy never shook the hand of the president or his wife.

We, in Florida, made sure of it.


47 posted on 03/18/2006 10:56:05 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Diago

Is it true that Selva actually paid to have these boys brought into the country? In essence, they were imported sex toys?


48 posted on 03/18/2006 10:56:27 AM PST by GVnana (Former Alias: GVgirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Da

I understand Jefferson advocated castration for rapists.


49 posted on 03/18/2006 10:58:36 AM PST by GVnana (Former Alias: GVgirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Diago
Psychologists testified that Selva was making progress in counseling and that it was not likely he would reoffend.

OK, let's look at this. Started treatment last December and it is now middle of March. How many times does he have to go for treatment? Because of the holidays in Dec. and Jan. and if he went once a week, he would have nine treatments total more than likely one hour at a time, so that would be nine hrs. so far and the psychologists say that Selva is making progress. That I can not believe!

Connor said it is unbelievable that the legislature would try to remove him for a ruling. With this kind of ruling, why would it be unbelievable, you didn't do your job.

"Every judge in the state should be worried and scared if they are able to do that," Connor said. That's right judge, there has to be a balance of justice somewhere. Do you think that you can make just any kind of ruling and nothing can be done about it. No judge, there has to be something done to judges like yourself who can not or will not meat out justice for a crime that comes before them. You just can not sit upon a bench and draw a lot of money, make a few decisions to please yourself and expect nothing to happen to you. You sir, have an obligation to the victims and the community to do your duty and you did not do it and from what I can tell, you haven't done it since you have been a judge.

"This type of atmosphere could seriously damage the impartiality of the courts."

Heven forbid that the court just couldn't let this person go free. I mean where is the impartiality of that/ sar.

50 posted on 03/18/2006 11:34:11 AM PST by AIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diago

Another John Gacy in waiting. He was a big time Democrat too.


51 posted on 03/18/2006 11:34:37 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diago
"Every judge in the state should be worried and scared if they are able to do that," Connor said.

Which is as it should be.

Judges need to learn that they are not autonomous.

Auto = self
nomous = law
autonomous = law unto themselves, able to dictate what is and what isn't law.

52 posted on 03/18/2006 11:50:08 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpotentRage

I agree! Just in the last few days we had the perverted kook in SC who had the 2 girls in his dungeon! WHy? The guy didn't qualify for the state's offender program???

G A R B A G E!!

When will the madness end?


53 posted on 03/18/2006 11:55:15 AM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping List Freepmail me if you want on or off this ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: socialismisinsidious

Sure, he will re-offend. As a former Dept of Corrections employee, child molesters see themselves as normal.

They don't really understand why they are incarcerated. Their desires for children are just as normal to them as normal people's desires for their spouse.

Only way to stop a child molester from re-offending....a .45 caliber lobotomy.


54 posted on 03/18/2006 12:04:06 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

I've read that somewhere, but I don't remember where now. He offered to pay for their educations as part of his plea, but the boys said no way. They didn't want to feel like they were being paid off.


55 posted on 03/18/2006 12:05:43 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

There's still more to this than the judge is saying. The reason the guy got a plea was because the victims didn't want it to go to trial...not because it wasn't true...but because the older one was afraid his (now) high school classmates would find out his identity. I can only imagine his fear at his peers discovering he had taken it in the rear end, even if it had been forced. No one would look at you the same way.

The family also didn't want the younger one to have to go through a trial. He was 5 when it started.

If the judge admits that he knew there had originally been 20 counts, and that's it's been plead down to 2 of a lesser charge, you can bet he is aware of the ages of the children involved. This scumbag Selva should have been imprisoned for at least part of the 5 years, if not the whole time. Hell, the kids had to be tormented and assaulted by him for 3 years. He deserves to be in prison for at LEAST that long!

I personally feel that Connor is a disgrace to the judicial system and to society. I can't believe his past convictions were set aside so that he could remain on the bench. This is sham justice. I want him to be removed now, and I want all judges to know that we are not going to keep bending over and taking it up the rear anymore.

FWIW, the local paper has also mentioned that Connor issued probation twice as often as the average here for plea deals. Plea deals are common, but a judge doesn't have to accept them. Even if he did, he was certainly within the law to order prison time for this offense. Connor injected his own personal bias into this case when he said that he had a problem that he was trying to manage, and that Selva has a problem that he should try to manage.


56 posted on 03/18/2006 12:25:47 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Please read my 56 for more info. I'm sorry that I don't have links to the reports I read, but I'm sure they can be found online somewhere.


57 posted on 03/18/2006 12:27:44 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

ping to another "incompetent judge" thread


58 posted on 03/18/2006 12:31:59 PM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping List Freepmail me if you want on or off this ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diago

Thanks for posting this. I am so upset that Connor was even allowed to be on the bench in the first place. I voted for his opponent, because I had already heard of Connor's many DUI arrests. He always wanted to be treated like he was above the law for those offenses. He got his way, and his poor judgment is now costing us more.


59 posted on 03/18/2006 12:32:58 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIC

I totally agree with your post.


60 posted on 03/18/2006 12:34:11 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson