Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

I hear that 90 is the new 40.

A bit of an exaggeration, but a few years more, certainly possible.
With the advances in biochemistry, genetics, and the actual mechanics of aging being decoded, I'm inclined to agree with the fellow who talks about 1,000 year lifespans.

There are probably less than a dozen major critical systems in the body, respiration, digestion, waste elimination, cell repair, circulation, etc. As the problems with these systems from an aging perspective are figured out, the limits on aging will be drastically pushed... I mean very, very drastically.

It's entirely possible you could wake up one morning and see a new ad on the tube for a pill that would add 200 years to your lifespan.

It'll cost $46,000,000 dollars, but hey...


13 posted on 03/16/2006 8:06:17 AM PST by djf (I'm not Islamophobic. But I am bombophobic! If that's the same, freakin deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: djf
As the problems with these systems from an aging perspective are figured out, the limits on aging will be drastically pushed... I mean very, very drastically.

Exactly. It's not about adding to the end of your life, but the middle. Not hanging on for 20 more years in a nursing home, but maintaining the physical health of a 25-year old indefinitely.

Concerns about Social Security and retirement are silly. If this happens, permanent retirement goes away completely because people won't become physically unable to work. Instead you could work for 40 years, take a few years off for an extended vacation, repeat as long as you want. Sign me up.

42 posted on 03/16/2006 10:00:57 AM PST by ThinkDifferent (Chloe rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson