Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye Dubai
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 14, 2006 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 03/14/2006 2:00:29 PM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Echo Talon
GWB calling Islam the religion of peace and going to mosques made us all fear Islam?

One man in the administration in limited situations. Rhetoric repeated over and over on Fox News by the administration's talking heads combined with almost weekly speeches on the War on Some Terrorism didn't help the general public's feelings towards Dubai at all

41 posted on 03/14/2006 3:00:00 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon

btt


42 posted on 03/14/2006 3:01:45 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Flavius Josephus

I'm merely saying all or nothing, everyone or no one. My understanding is few/if any of these terminals are solely run by domestic companies so any awful lot of money is going to have to come from somewhere to buyout all the contracts and joint ventures currently in place. Also, why just the ports, how about airport terminals?

I was unaware of any pending legislation concerning other foreign operators, good catch, I will look for more info bill numbers, cosponsors, etc....


43 posted on 03/14/2006 3:02:32 PM PST by thinkthenpost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: billbears

we were at war with Dubai? Lets see how hard the WOT will be when the whole Arab world becomes as transparent and cooperative as Iran. treat you partners like the enemy and thats what you're gonna get.


44 posted on 03/14/2006 3:03:33 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Flavius Josephus

It's not a matter of waking up. Everyone's awake. Nobody wants to do without. "Waking up" involves letting grandma die because we honestly cannot afford the cost of treatment to keep her on dialysis (example). So the wake up argument is a non-starter. We need to make hard secular choices.


45 posted on 03/14/2006 3:06:44 PM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: billbears

"After 4+ years of the administration's whipping up the masses against anything and everything Arabic, what else did they think would happen?"

Good point. Now lets think about this one. Here we are in the USA and our own Government is posting terrorist threats. Is that terrorizing citizens? Kind of absurd to think about it, isn't it?


46 posted on 03/14/2006 3:08:43 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow ("You're either with us or with the terrorists." Time to live up to that statement Mr. President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: thinkthenpost

this country looks like a bunch of DUMASSES.

Take a look at Dubai's response. Then tell the MAJORITY of Americans that they are "DUMBASSES".

Once again, I see this minority of a so called democracy telling the Republic that they are stupid.

Get lost.


47 posted on 03/14/2006 3:15:42 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow ("You're either with us or with the terrorists." Time to live up to that statement Mr. President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

" treat you partners like the enemy and thats what you're gonna get."

Treat enemies like your friends and think of what your going to get!


48 posted on 03/14/2006 3:17:29 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow ("You're either with us or with the terrorists." Time to live up to that statement Mr. President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

"hoodwinked by hysterical opportunistic pols.....like Schumer and Hillary."

Absolutely amazing...rofl. It's not like maybe you got hoodwinked by the lobbying of Albright, Clinton, Dashle, etc.

Bwwahhaaaaaaa


49 posted on 03/14/2006 3:21:49 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow ("You're either with us or with the terrorists." Time to live up to that statement Mr. President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow

hell of way to try and make friends especially after they stuck their necks out in a tough neighborhood and offered to help us.


50 posted on 03/14/2006 3:23:08 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow

"Once again, I see this minority of a so called democracy telling the Republic that they are stupid."

Yep. Waaay too much animosity about this deal not going down.

Reasonable minds may differ, FRiends. The deal didnt go down, so just get over it and move on.


51 posted on 03/14/2006 3:28:07 PM PST by Canedawg (And then?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow
I invite you over for dinner, your kids spend the night with mine, your business buys items from mine and vice versa, our wives gossip about the family down the street, hell we're in the neighborhood watch program.

I decide to buy the house down the street, maybe rent it, maybe fix it up hell I might move in. You then kick me in the balls, call my wife a whore, try to get the kids expelled, and finally hit me up for a better price like nothing happened.

I can certainly understand the UAE's response.

The majority of Americans, probably aren't paying attention, were you aware that nearly every port terminal in this country was run by a foreign owned corporation? I knew several were, I had no idea basically all are, I do now. Obviously you are against DPW taking ove P&O,I ask how is DPW any worse than Red China?
52 posted on 03/14/2006 3:31:50 PM PST by thinkthenpost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow

BTTT!


53 posted on 03/14/2006 3:33:17 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

"well.. China and Singapore has government owned/controlled companies managing our ports, when are we going to kick them out? Or is their an unwritten rule to allow Communist and Asians to do these jobs?"

I agree wholeheartedly, let's buy ALL foreign businesses out of positions that are important to America's national security and auction those positions off to American hands. But I don't expect you'll be writing your Congressman about that any time soon, will you?


54 posted on 03/14/2006 3:40:12 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow
Here we are in the USA and our own Government is posting terrorist threats. Is that terrorizing citizens?

Not in and of itself if two aspects are met.

1) the threat is real, which in reality they probably aren't. The national government is nothing more than a bumbling bureaucracy. To believe they have stopped each and every threat with no failure is beyond the pale
2) the government allows local authorities to handle the situation as much as possible, which considering the size of the 'threats' the government warns us about makes that aspect unviable.

Are there threats out there? Probably so. Are the threats at the level or number the government tells us about? Doubtful.

I'm just wondering if 'conservatives' will be as gung-ho about 'homeland' security when eventually a Democratic administration comes into power. Somehow, I'm thinking they won't be. Now either the threat is real or it isn't, regardless of the party in power. However if the threat somehow becomes less real when another party is in power, all these current threats are nothing more than partisan posturing to make sure the 'right' party stays in power (sheep vote for whoever protects them the most). As I can't tell the difference between the parties much anymore, I could care less

55 posted on 03/14/2006 3:40:29 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon

Just out of curiosity, under your thinking, shouldn't we be doing business with North Korea and Cuba? Or is our national policy against trading with them irrational and not in our best interests?


56 posted on 03/14/2006 3:42:53 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow

"Absolutely amazing...rofl. It's not like maybe you got hoodwinked by the lobbying of Albright, Clinton, Dashle, etc."

You forgot Carter. Never forget Carter.


57 posted on 03/14/2006 3:44:19 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
But I don't expect you'll be writing your Congressman about that any time soon, will you?

Nope, because management has nothing to do with security, be it China, Singapore or the UAE.

58 posted on 03/14/2006 3:45:02 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: thinkthenpost

First off, your analogy is incomplete.

You forgot the part where you also hide money from the people that robbed my house, and you pay off a bonus to the families of people that murder my friends. You also left off the part where you threaten that if I don't invite you to dinner you'll stop selling gas and supplies to me at your store, and not 'let me' run the security concession for your business any more (even though you live in a high crime 'hood), and the other people interested in running your business' security would probably also take your stuff.

Further, it's incorrect. Where you say "I decide to buy the house down the street, maybe rent it, maybe fix it up hell I might move in," you add all these additional possibilities that never occurred. Nobody said you'd rent it, fix it, move in yourself, or improve it at all. You told us you were just going to be responsible for its upkeep and buying it as an investment. And we didn't like that idea because we've seen the neighborhood you come from, and don't like what your side of the tracks looks like, and know you are far more connected to your 'hood than you'll ever be to a home you're buying as an investment.

"Obviously you are against DPW taking ove P&O,I ask how is DPW any worse than Red China?"

You act as if the reaction was going to be "Then we should let the UAE in, because we need MORE security risks like China." DPW isn't worse than China. It's the SAME. We should get them out, too. Question answered.


59 posted on 03/14/2006 3:54:07 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Then we should probably contract out our defense R&D management to them, too. After all, we can probably get Chinese or UAE to do R&D cheaper, and management doesn't have anything to do with security.


60 posted on 03/14/2006 3:56:32 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson