How reliable is this?
It's the New York Times (The ones that brought us Jason Blair) not very, in my humble opinion.
I found it : )
"Overseen by the Joint Forces Command, an unclassified version of the study is to be made public soon. A classified version was prepared in April 2005. Titled "Iraqi Perspectives on Operation Iraqi Freedom, Major Combat Operations," the study shows that Mr. Hussein discounted the possibility of a full..."
Am I reading this correctly, that these authors had access to a classified report??!
The NY Times is always very biased- but they do have very talented reporters and great access- it's a shame that they can't be given much trust- very interesting article- I believe most of it.
It's a report of what the Iraqi general said, and it's in the New York Times. Therefore, it's not reliable at all. It's just interesting. I STILL believe there were WMDs, Saddam wouldn't give them up, it's not in his nature.