How reliable is this?
This will make for some interesting reading 10-15 years down the line when all of the information about the Iraqi campaign is released by the DoD.
On the whole, it looks like Colin Powell's presentation was a misinterpretation of events, and a rather understandable one at that. Saddam was trying to play both sides - convincing the U.N. he was clean while making his neighbors believe he was still packing. No wonder Kerry liked him so much. The next Republican presidential candidate should feel free to point out that the route suggested by the U.N. lovers was playing right into Saddam's hand. The sanctions would have to be dropped when the inspections came up empty and Saddam would have been free to resume WMD development - including nukes.
Look at the headline again, pretending that you get all your info from the MSM this time. I believe the subtext is clearly, "Hussein is smarter than Bush. Bush, because he [we've told you] 'had no plan', therefore [we have convinced you] 'didn't know' that Iraq would become the mess that [we've convinced you] it is today. But look: Hussein did. Another point for 'leaving Hussein in power would have been better'".
I'm pretty sure that's the angle the headline-writer tried to put on this story, anyway. You guys are screwing up their careful spin by thinking more for yourselves than you were supposed to. Shame.