Replies

Looks like the ID/Creation position is making major advances.

In 20 years, the ToE will be cast on the ash-heap of history. the more we learn about about the inner working of a simple cell and reproduction, the more obvious it will become that macro-evolution is impossible.

Doesn't look like many people care what Judge Jones ruled. people realize that the ruling of one judge means nothing in regards to the truth.

Looks like the ID/Creation position is making major advances.

Wishful thinking. And a push poll by a liberal organization, likely trying to suck Republicans into the quick sand of ID.

In 20 years, the ToE will be cast on the ash-heap of history.

And what would your view have been during the Scopes trial when there were significant segments of the population who thought just as you do now.

the more we learn about about the inner working of a simple cell and reproduction, the more obvious it will become that macro-evolution is impossible.

The more we learn about various genomes, the more evidence we have that confirms evolution. In particular, the ERV evidence that we have been discussing on this thread matches the decades old fossil morphological studies, which is a "dissimilar" confirmation of evolution. It's like getting the fingerprints of the murderer on the gun, and a video tape of his act. Both sets of evidence cross-confirm each other.

Doesn't look like many people care what Judge Jones ruled. people realize that the ruling of one judge means nothing in regards to the truth.

Then you've been ignoring the wholesale rush of conservative leaders to distance themselves away from this issue. Name for me one conservative politician who has embraced, or even positively mentioned, ID or creationism since the Dover ruling.

You live in a many dimensioned fantasy land.

In 20 years, the ToE will be cast on the ash-heap of history. the more we learn about about the inner working of a simple cell and reproduction, the more obvious it will become that macro-evolution is impossible

I find it amusing that people who possess no knowledge at all of modern biology can confidently predict where it will be in 20 years. Amusing, but a little sad. And your inability to learn from the past is almost as sad. You repeatedly misforecast the outcome of the Dover trial, remember. Didn't that make you reconsider the wisdom of such prognostications? Or are you simply relying on the fact that in 20 years, no one will remember or care what you said?