Skip to comments.
Building the 787 | When lightning strikes
Seattle Times ^
| Sunday, March 5, 2006
| Dominic Gates
Posted on 03/05/2006 2:41:40 PM PST by phantomworker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: narby
> I'm sure there will be inter-fiber damage in a strike where the lightning jumps between fibers...
What seems more likely, at least to me, is the use of a copper or aluminum mesh on the outer surface. I was tangentially involved with lighting protection studies for a carbon-fiber-based military missile, and such a mesh ("Astromesh," IIRC) was used to give the missile the conductivity called for. This mesh does not need to be much... basically foil with holes. Still, it's added inert and structurally useless weight.
41
posted on
03/06/2006 8:24:43 AM PST
by
orionblamblam
(A furore Normannorum libra nos, Domine)
To: phantomworker
I know that some fiberglass can be patched with some epoxy and a new piece. Of course, you aren't dealing with pressurization and structural issues. The patch would also likely create a bulge.
I'll confess that I don't know if that works with carbon fiber or whether it would work with aircraft applications.
42
posted on
03/06/2006 9:26:28 AM PST
by
PAR35
To: PAR35; phantomworker
That's what bothers me about this whole thing. Sure, there is a lot of speculation about how the composites might react in a fire or how you might fix them, but I don't see anyone stepping forward to say that they've actually thought these problems fully through and they aren't a problem or they've figured out a way to deal with them. All I see is a void on the subjects and they are fairly important subjects.
To: Question_Assumptions; PAR35
Gillette said his team is perhaps only months away from agreeing with the FAA on an overall 787 certification plan, which will include proving that the risk of a lightning-induced fuel-tank explosion is less than one in a billion. It does sound like they are addressing these issues. Any cert plan for the FAA has to be bullet proof. And the FAA always holds Boeing to the highest standards.
44
posted on
03/06/2006 9:58:41 AM PST
by
phantomworker
(The environment you fashion out of your thoughts, beliefs, & ideals is the environment you live in.)
To: Yo-Yo
"They're going to paint every inch of the 787 fuselage no matter what. Unless they want a black aircraft."
You are right. I was thinking about an aluminium skin.
Senility is catching up with me.
45
posted on
03/06/2006 10:03:47 AM PST
by
cpdiii
(roughneck (oil field trash and proud of it), geologist, pilot, pharmacist, full time iconoclast)
To: phantomworker
46
posted on
03/06/2006 11:21:18 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: phantomworker
Fair enough, though I'd like to see the fire characteristics and repair methods described in some detail. Perhaps these are essentially trade secrets that Boeing will discuss once the plane is in general production.
To: Jonah Hex; All
This occurred prior to 9/11. I'd hate to think of our reaction if it'd happen after that day. (Probably a sudden drop in cabin pressure as a few hundred sphincters tightened at once.) That line brought a story I once read to mind. In the 1700s the question arose of how fast electricity traveled. The abbe of a French (IIRC) monestary was into science and decided to do an experiment: he called on his monks to gather in a circle with a Leyden jar (one of the earliest forms of battery) between him and nearest monk. He had them join hands while he held the Leyden anode, then he asked the last monk in the chain to grab the cathode ... and the entire assembly of monks jumped at the same time from the shock!
48
posted on
03/06/2006 2:13:26 PM PST
by
IonImplantGuru
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
To: phantomworker
Yes...from acompany in China...
49
posted on
03/06/2006 5:02:37 PM PST
by
baltodog
(R.I.P. Balto: 2001(?) - 2005)
To: baltodog
A company from China off-loaded to Wichita!!! Is this a new trend?
50
posted on
03/06/2006 7:33:19 PM PST
by
phantomworker
("The environment you fashion out of your thoughts, beliefs & ideals is the environment you live in.")
To: phantomworker
No, not really...
We make composite 747 parts for Mitsubishi and Kawasaki, as well.
We're also doing the door for the new US101 Presidential Helicopter...That's Agusta-Westland in England.
There are several composite assemblies we make for a company in Czechoslovakia, who in turn, installs them on new Sikorsky helicopters.
Aviation, especially the composite side, is truly global.
51
posted on
03/07/2006 4:47:38 AM PST
by
baltodog
(R.I.P. Balto: 2001(?) - 2005)
To: narby
I would imagine that the "must haves" for EMI/EMC would also tend to preclude any major issues due to lightning strikes.
52
posted on
03/07/2006 9:47:47 AM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
That is hilarious! Wish I had it years ago when working in the composite arena.
Comment #54 Removed by Moderator
To: phantomworker
How about gold plating cost and weigh? A super thin layer of gold will conduct much and not weigh so much. A gold airplane would be so cool ya wouldn’t need much paint.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson