Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judgment day for 'Duke' Cunningham (Disgraced ex-congressman receives 100 months prison sentence)
San Diego Union - Tribune ^ | 3/3/06 | Karen Kucher, Greg Gross and Angelica Martinez

Posted on 03/03/2006 2:18:39 PM PST by NormsRevenge

SAN DIEGO – Former U.S. Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham arrived in San Diego's federal courthouse Friday morning for sentencing on bribery charges, flanked by his lawyers and surrounded by a crowd of news crews.

He looked gaunt and shaky as he entered a courtroom filled to capacity, with the news media taking seats in the jury box as well as some of those in the audience.

Inside, he was greeted and hugged by well-wishers, including Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Alpine. When Father Joe Carroll arrived, he and Cunningham hugged and clasped hands in greeting. Carroll, who runs a local shelter for the homeless, took a seat directly behind the disgraced ex-congressman.

Willie Driscoll, who with Cunningham won fame in a Navy F-4 Phantom II over North Vietnam, also was in the courtroom.

With prosecutors seeking the maximum 10-year sentence, the defense opened with a counter-argument: Six is enough.

“What sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary?” said defense attorney Lee Blalack.

Cunningham wiped his eyes as Blalack described the ex-congressman's actions as “quite egregious,” but still argued for the shortest possible sentence, calling six years “a substantial prison term.”

“This man has been humiliated by his own name,” Blalack said. “He is estranged by those he knows. He will go to jail. Under that scenario, no member of Congress can conclude that he got away.

“Given his age, health, life service . . . six years does it.”

Cunningham pleaded guilty Nov. 28 to tax evasion and conspiracy to commit bribery and honest-services fraud. He resigned from office the same day.

In their legal filings last month, prosecutors argued that he deserved the maximum sentence – the harshest ever given a congressman – because he “used his congressional office to get rich.”

“The length, breadth and depth of Cunningham's crimes against the people of the United States are unprecedented for a sitting Member of Congress. So, too, should be his sentence,” the federal prosecutors wrote.

“For the better part of a decade, Cunningham, in effect, erected a 'for sale' sign upon our nation's capital.”

In their written arguments, Cunningham's lawyers asked for the sentence of no more than six years, contending his health – he has suffered from prostate cancer and other ailments – probably gives him no more than seven years to live.

The defense cited Cunningham's military career and lengthy public service, and argued that he had already lost his home along with much of his belongings, and faces a massive tax bill over income he failed to report.

They also offered a statement from a psychiatrist who said Cunningham's corruption stemmed from “an outsized ego and a mantle of invulnerability” that enabled him to rationalize his actions.

Cunningham, a naval aviator, was a Vietnam war ace and a Top Gun pilot who rode that fame into political office. He was elected to Congress in 1990 and was elected again seven times, representing a large part of northern San Diego and much of the North County.

In 1998, he was named to the House Appropriations Committee, where he served on the defense subcommittee. He also sat on the House Intelligence Committee and was chairman of a subcommittee overseeing human intelligence analysis and counterintelligence.

Federal investigators began to investigate Cunningham's financial dealings after a Copley News Service story published in The San Diego Union-Tribune in June reported that a defense contractor bought Cunningham's Del Mar-area home and then sold it for a $700,000 loss.

Cunningham sold the house for $1.675 million in November 2003, but the buyer, defense contractor Mitchell Wade, never moved in and almost immediately put it back on the market. Wade sold it 261 days later for $975,000.

The federal investigation subsequently found that two contractors paid $2.4 million in bribes to Cunningham, who at one point created a “bribe menu” that spelled out the amount of money it would take to free up federal contracts.

Last Friday, Wade, 46, admitted in federal court he conspired to funnel more than $1 million in bribes to Cunningham.

Wade pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy and single counts of using interstate facilities to promote bribery and of election fraud. He faces a possible 11-year prison sentence and a fine.

The other contractor linked to the Cunningham bribes is Brent Wilkes, head of ADCS Inc., a defense contractor who lives in Poway.

Wilkes agreed to pay off a $525,000 mortgage on Cunningham's Rancho SantaFe home in exchange for $6 million in government funds, according to court documents.

When he pleaded guilty in November, Cunningham agreed to forfeit $1.8 million in bribes, his financial interest in the Rancho Santa Fe home he and his wife have since sold and a long list of antiques and other furnishings now to be auctioned off by the government.

Prosecutors say he also owes the IRS $1.57 million in back taxes, penalties and interest, although Cunningham and his lawyers dispute that amount.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; crook; cunningham; disgraced; duke; dukecunningham; excongressman; judgmentday; scumbag; sentencing; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

JOHN McCUTCHEN / Union-Tribune

Former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, center, is escorted by aides on his arrival at the federal courthouse downtown for sentencing.


1 posted on 03/03/2006 2:18:41 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

10 years sounds good. Especially since federal prisons don't offer early parole.


2 posted on 03/03/2006 2:26:14 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Cunningham had a great career going and decided to sell-out to the highest bidder. He deserves whatever he gets.
3 posted on 03/03/2006 2:28:26 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BW2221
He deserves whatever he gets.

Damn right.

4 posted on 03/03/2006 2:32:36 PM PST by SIDENET ("IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; BW2221; Dog Gone
Sad...pathetically so.

An unbelievable betrayal of everything he fought for...and he did fight well for his country way back when. He let it go to his head and thought he was above the very principles he swore to uphold and defend. Very sad...but a time tested and well worn message to us all...power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Too bad he gave into the dark side...irrespective of his politcal positions. He dserves the stiffest penalty possible for his betrayal.

5 posted on 03/03/2006 2:35:24 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BW2221

Sounds like he's sorry -- sorry he got caught. I'm sorry that an authentic war hero could do this; he didn't have to, congressfolk get a very nice salary, wonderful benefits and a huge pension.


6 posted on 03/03/2006 2:36:54 PM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"They also offered a statement from a psychiatrist who said Cunningham's corruption stemmed from “an outsized ego and a mantle of invulnerability” that enabled him to rationalize his actions. "

I'd say he's cured of this particular "ailment"

7 posted on 03/03/2006 2:39:43 PM PST by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
He deserves his punishment.

...took a seat directly behind the disgraced ex-congressman.

I wonder if this publication has ever referred to the impeached former president the rapist in such a perjorative term.

It's notable that Cunningham doesn't have the wall of party supporters willing to overlook his lawlessness as did clinton.

8 posted on 03/03/2006 2:40:37 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic

I This is an enigma...I NEVER MET THE MAN, though have
voted for im in the past. I am sure he is sorry, they
all are after the deed is done...whatever is fair for
a penalty will not take the place of the disgrace, that
greed has designated for him...bye, bye, life goes on
and soon or sooner..another one will fall. Jake


9 posted on 03/03/2006 2:44:47 PM PST by sanjacjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone


He'll still receive his government pensions.


10 posted on 03/03/2006 2:46:15 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I never liked Cunningham and I always will.


11 posted on 03/03/2006 2:46:35 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I wish the prosecutors and judge would send a message to every politician in America: Their should be more severe sentences for those who betray the public trust. 10 years sounds too easy. Give him 20.
12 posted on 03/03/2006 2:50:50 PM PST by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Make him walk through past a line of citizens and let us spit on the disgusting pig.


13 posted on 03/03/2006 2:52:55 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
They also offered a statement from a psychiatrist who said Cunningham's corruption stemmed from “an outsized ego and a mantle of invulnerability” that enabled him to rationalize his actions.

Pulleeeeeezz... and we're supposed to feel sorry?

14 posted on 03/03/2006 2:56:52 PM PST by RightField (The older you get . . . the older "old" is !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
No disgraced is only a word used as a descriptive adjective in front of Republicans names.

disgraced President Nixon
disgraced Abramoff
disgraced Cunningham;

now I agree that disgraced would fit fine in front of Clinton. We need to suggest that to the fine journalist who wrote this story. I'm sure they will want to be consistent and welcome our feedback.
15 posted on 03/03/2006 2:56:59 PM PST by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Cunningham got 8 years, 4 months.


16 posted on 03/03/2006 2:57:56 PM PST by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

100 Months in the pokey!


17 posted on 03/03/2006 2:58:07 PM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
He'll still receive his government pensions.

I believe President Bush has signed the law which will prevent that in the future, although I'm not sure. Regardless, it won't apply to Cunningham.

18 posted on 03/03/2006 2:59:00 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I once had the honor of meeting Duke in Pansacola. He came by to the the mural of his Phantom. Such a sad story.

All the same - Duke knows the deal - when you mess up you have to stand up and take it on the chin. Falling from honor does not mean you can't act like you know what honor means.


19 posted on 03/03/2006 3:00:20 PM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

Thanks. 8 years, 4 months.

Wonder of he'll get sent to Nellis in North Las Vegas?


20 posted on 03/03/2006 3:00:24 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson