[flattorney]

I disagree with a few items in this article, but it is still very good. I believe this current SCOTUS Texas Redistricting case is more a clarification case stemming off the SCOTUS Pennsylvania redistricting case in 2004. The lower courts are getting log jammed on this issue and need SCOTUS guidance on several key issues. I wrote about all this months back in The DeLay Chronicles. - fla

[Mind-numbed Robot]

Thanks for keeping up with all this and adding some clarity to it.

[JohnnyZ]

I think they should strike down DeLay's district and place him in a safer one, ha ha ha

[nopardons]

bttt

[goldstategop]

My take is the court will uphold the boundaries. Its involves a political question its not the province of the courts to adjudicate. You can't take partisanship out of redistricting. The Democrats filed this case because they lost, pure and simple.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

[Balding_Eagle]

As I pointed out on the thread about Ginsburg sleeping though arguments, she's already made up her mind.

At least her vote is going to be to overturn.