Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldFriend

It's hard to tell. While Rush Limbaugh took a much more measured initial response, basically deferring judgment until he learned more facts, Hannity was quickly on record as against it.

Now he's painted himself into a corner by resorting to bogus arguments against the deal. If he's opposed to the deal based on reasons having nothing to do with the ports, there's no way to backtrack in 45 days because the bogus reasons won't be "investigated and resolved" in that period. He's left himself no "out."

I like Hannity in general, but he's no intellectual heavyweight. He tries to compensate with enthusiasm. That usually will work, but only when it's a fairly simple issue. This time it's backfiring on him, and I doubt he'll ever admit it.


375 posted on 03/01/2006 5:35:04 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone; OldFriend
That's my sense of it Hannity boxed himself in.

...won't be "investigated and resolved" in that period. He's left himself no "out."

I see this deal going through upon further review by the Bush Administration...unless they find a show stopper that cannot be resolved, which I doubt will happen.

376 posted on 03/01/2006 5:56:41 PM PST by demlosers (Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson