OK, if I don't present evidence, you squawk that I have none.
If I do present real, no-fooling evidence, you squawk that I'm spamming.
Make up your flippin' mind already.
Spamming is where you fill up a thread with a 5000-10000 word article (that you post on every thread) that really adds nothing to the discussion, but is very irritating.
If that is the best evidence you have of the observance of "naturalistic evolutionary speciation" then you might as well admit that you have no such evidence. What you have is evidence that in closed controlled situations you can force miniscule changes in one species, but at the end of the day (unless you define species extremely broadly) you still have the same species and any changes that you made did not occur naturally at all.