Skip to comments.
Fla. Bill Would Give Dogs a Place at Table
http://www.comcast.net/ ^
| 2 24 06
| DAVID ROYSE
Posted on 02/24/2006 2:12:05 PM PST by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
there go those small government repubs again shrinking the size and scope of the government you cant allow smoking in bars and resturants but you haveto be forced to accept dogs eating at your resturants that makes a hall of a lot of sence(in bizzaro world)
To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...

Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
2
posted on
02/24/2006 2:13:17 PM PST
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: SheLion; Gabz; Diana in Wisconsin
not a smoking ping buta hypocrisy ping the same pols that wont allow you to let smoking take place are tryingot force resturant owners to allow dogs to eat at resturants
3
posted on
02/24/2006 2:15:10 PM PST
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: freepatriot32
Don't worry. Wait till these dogs start to wee wee on kids shoes sitting next to the offending table, and fathers start to produce 44 magnums and taking them (the dogs of course) out of action.
4
posted on
02/24/2006 2:15:12 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: freepatriot32
Wonder how long before a misunderstood pitt bull rips off a kids face while they're eating a burger.
To: freepatriot32
Canines aren't allowed to smoke at the tables though!! This is just plain stupid. Doesn't the Florida Legislature have anything better to do...like govern.
6
posted on
02/24/2006 2:16:32 PM PST
by
Daytyn71
To: freepatriot32; Chieftain
My beautiful Lola already goes with me to dine Al Fresco at Paneras and outdoors for coffee at Starbucks. Get over it...in Europe dogs are allowed IN many restaurants and on buses, subways and trains.
To: freepatriot32
but you haveto be forced to accept dogs eating at your resturants Didn't you read the article you posted? What's up with that?
8
posted on
02/24/2006 2:17:55 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Plymouth Sentinel
See. I can use more appropriate grammatic constructs.
9
posted on
02/24/2006 2:18:51 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: freepatriot32
but you haveto be forced to accept dogs eating at your resturants Doesn't match up with the article's statement: No restaurant would be required to let the dogs in,
10
posted on
02/24/2006 2:18:57 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Next Olympics I want wide track bobsledding. Four sleds on the track at once - like Ben Hur on ice.)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Chicago allows dogs to dine along with owners outside if the proprietor allows . . . .
11
posted on
02/24/2006 2:19:09 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: freepatriot32

I have dog germs! Get some hot water! Get some disinfectant! Get some iodine!
12
posted on
02/24/2006 2:21:06 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Next Olympics I want wide track bobsledding. Four sleds on the track at once - like Ben Hur on ice.)
To: freepatriot32
not a smoking ping buta hypocrisy ping the same pols that wont allow you to let smoking take place are tryingot force resturant owners to allow dogs to eat at resturants In all fairness, the article specifically says no restaurant would be forced to allow dogs in the outdoor dining area. I personally agree that a business owner should have the freedom to decide who his target market is, whether it be dog owners, smokers, or whatever.
13
posted on
02/24/2006 2:22:08 PM PST
by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
To: HairOfTheDog
14
posted on
02/24/2006 2:22:16 PM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
To: freepatriot32
Who let the Dogs out
Who, Who, Who-Who
Who let the Dogs out
Who, Who, Who-Who
Who let the Dogs out
Who, Who, Who-Who
Who let the Dogs out
Who, Who, Who-Who
15
posted on
02/24/2006 2:23:13 PM PST
by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: freepatriot32
16
posted on
02/24/2006 2:23:22 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: freepatriot32
Are the dogs allowed to play cards? Since they can't smoke you know.
17
posted on
02/24/2006 2:23:29 PM PST
by
Sybeck1
To: 1rudeboy
It's also very common in Europe
18
posted on
02/24/2006 2:26:30 PM PST
by
RVN Airplane Driver
(Most Americans are so spoiled with freedom they have no idea what it takes to earn and keep it.)
To: freepatriot32
Interesting, this has recently become an issue here in Austin as well. Makes me wonder if some advocacy group is pushing it...
To: freepatriot32
there go those small government repubs again shrinking the size and scope of the government you cant allow smoking in bars and resturants but you haveto be forced to accept dogs eating at your resturants that makes a hall of a lot of sence(in bizzaro world) NO.
This is a republican bill.
It allows each restaurant to choose whether or not to accept dogs.
So9
20
posted on
02/24/2006 2:28:43 PM PST
by
Servant of the 9
(" I am just going outside, and may be some time.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson