[bvw]

" The odds that the association is simply due to chance are only one in 250"

So Darwinists have some limited understanding of probability. Would that they apply it more broadly.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

" So Darwinists have some limited understanding of probability. Would that they apply it more broadly."

Better than the anti-evo's complete lack of any mathematical sophistication. :)

[ConservativeBamaFan]

“There are all these species out there and so few of them are known in intimate detail, so any kind of ecological characterization, through no fault of ecologists, will be limited in accuracy and precision,” Funk says.

Nevertheless, the researchers decided to do the best they could with the information available. . . . . . .

Don’t you just love “science?”

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

So Darwinists have some limited understanding of probability. Would that they apply it more broadly.

Well they apply it as they see fit because they are "scientists" for Darwin's sake. Priests of the monkey god. Guardians of the soup myth cult. Don't question it heretic.

[WildHorseCrash]

So Darwinists have some limited understanding of probability. Would that they apply it more broadly.

Creationoids don't have any understanding of probability or how to apply it, but think they do because the answers they make up support their religion.

[LiteKeeper]

Creationists have believed in Natural Selection as an explanation for speciation from the beginning.