Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Concerning your statement that "Natural selection isn't defined by speciation" one is driven to ask just exactly what it was Darwinian evolutionists think Darwin was up to when he sought to address the issue in "The Origin of Species"?

On those long sea voyages, maybe Darwin was simply thinking of girls or something, eh?!

29 posted on 02/24/2006 5:04:02 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
"Concerning your statement that "Natural selection isn't defined by speciation" one is driven to ask just exactly what it was Darwinian evolutionists think Darwin was up to when he sought to address the issue in "The Origin of Species"?"

Speciation is ONE end product of natural selection. It is not the only one. Speciation is not required for natural selection to have occurred, or for it to be noticeable. I am sure, since you have read Darwin, you already knew this. :)

"On those long sea voyages, maybe Darwin was simply thinking of girls or something, eh?!"

He was too busy getting sea sick.
33 posted on 02/24/2006 5:07:29 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson