To: CarolinaGuitarman
Concerning your statement that
"Natural selection isn't defined by speciation" one is driven to ask just exactly what it was Darwinian evolutionists think Darwin was up to when he sought to address the issue in
"The Origin of Species"?
On those long sea voyages, maybe Darwin was simply thinking of girls or something, eh?!
29 posted on
02/24/2006 5:04:02 AM PST by
muawiyah
(-)
To: muawiyah
"Concerning your statement that "Natural selection isn't defined by speciation" one is driven to ask just exactly what it was Darwinian evolutionists think Darwin was up to when he sought to address the issue in "The Origin of Species"?"
Speciation is ONE end product of natural selection. It is not the only one. Speciation is not required for natural selection to have occurred, or for it to be noticeable. I am sure, since you have read Darwin, you already knew this. :)
"On those long sea voyages, maybe Darwin was simply thinking of girls or something, eh?!"
He was too busy getting sea sick.
33 posted on
02/24/2006 5:07:29 AM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson