To: VadeRetro
No mention of how this new find, beaver-tail otter-similar, falls out on the monotreme-marsupial-placental typology (is it too early?) or what its ear/jaw bones are like. Probably is a little early but will beinteresting to see when the work is done. I always wonder, though, how monotreme-marsupials would be viewed if none were extant today. We would have any clue as to how they functioned?
42 posted on
02/23/2006 12:57:38 PM PST by
GreenFreeper
(Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
To: GreenFreeper
Without soft tissue or extant forms, the fossil record of monotremes and marsupials would be a much greater puzzle, no question.
44 posted on
02/23/2006 12:59:41 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: GreenFreeper
I always wonder, though, how monotreme-marsupials would be viewed if none were extant today. Your interest in Jurassic beaver is noted.
54 posted on
02/23/2006 1:06:18 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
To: GreenFreeper; VadeRetro
Here's a
brief but good layman's page looking at what we know about pre-Eutheric mammals.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson