It was an angry poster on an internet forum. I don't see it as harmFUL by any means. Just angry. And there's sure enough of that lately.
What I am asking is........why are you questioning me about calling someone else on what I believe to be completely irresponsible attacks on someone like Rush, or the President, when you don't seem to have a problem with those who are doing the attacking?
I can talk to you but stay away from, uh, nuts? There are few posters who agree about the bashing on both sides. You were one and I "know" you as we've chatted before.
What is the standard here? They are permitted to say anything, and I am not permitted to challenge them, and say what I think? I'm really curious as to the rules of this 'game' you are playing....
I've seldom seen you use the same "tools" they do. You're usually above that. Just wanted to "keep you there". Sorry.
It is possible to be angry, and still be responsible.
When you are a child, you may say and do things you shouldn't in anger, but as an adult, you are supposed to be in control of that...........and if you LOSE control, there should be an apology that follows.
I'm sorry if I don't give such a wide berth to people who, IMO, are lying and being irresponsible. There has been no apology for evil words said in anger here.
And I do note that you challenged me on my 'hater' comment (and I am perfectly calm here). Have you challenged them on their 'angry' words and false charges, or is there a double standard here?