Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Canedawg

This doesn't impact port security in the slightest. Of course I only base that opinion on thirty years of active duty in the U.S. Coast Guard, much directly involving port security, and my continued involvement with the maritime industry.


267 posted on 02/23/2006 1:53:10 PM PST by CWOJackson (Tancredo? Wasn't he the bounty hunter in Star Wars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: CWOJackson

This argument that "this doesn't affect port security in the slightest" is not concrete.

So it doesn't affect those who provide the security, however ponder this example...if a terrorist with the intent of destruction moves to Newark, it doesn't affect how the Newark Police operate, but it does increase the chance of destruction in Newark. The police still have to catch the terrorist. The probability of destruction increases.


278 posted on 02/23/2006 1:57:57 PM PST by dcgard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

To: CWOJackson

Why dont we just put them in charge of airport security, too? Let them operate the metal detectors. Let's make it one big Armageddon party!


283 posted on 02/23/2006 1:58:55 PM PST by Canedawg (Two ears, one mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson