[muawiyah]

I presume you read the judge's decision. He inserted his own personal beliefs about what or is not legitimately "religion".

I, personally, don't consider ID or Creationism to be "legitimate religious beliefs" for one thing, and it incenses me to find a judge who thinks he's some sort of government ordained pope with the authority to tell me what is or is not a legitimate religious belief.

How's them apples?!

[antiRepublicrat]

I, personally, don't consider ID or Creationism to be "legitimate religious beliefs" for one thing

The judge never decided on the legitimacy of any religious belief. As you said, that's not his place.

What he did decide on was whether ID is secular science. This case is much narrower than most of your rhetoric has been.

[Quark2005]

I, personally, don't consider ID or Creationism to be "legitimate religious beliefs" for one thing, and it incenses me to find a judge who thinks he's some sort of government ordained pope with the authority to tell me what is or is not a legitimate religious belief.

Then what are they? They certainly aren't "legitimate scientific theories"...

[Deadshot Drifter]

I, personally, don't consider ID or Creationism to be "legitimate religious beliefs" for one thing, and it incenses me to find a judge who thinks he's some sort of government ordained pope with the authority to tell me what is or is not a legitimate religious belief. How's them apples?!

Sounds more like sour Creationist grapes to me.