[freedumb2003]

Terminology is not the only thing that "evolves" with evolutionists. For instance, look up all the vestigial organs claimed by evolutionists to prove their theory. Most have now been proven to have uses and not be so vestigial at all.

That is at the periphery of the discussion. It is used as supporting evidence.

To use that as a refutation is like me saying "well, the Shroud of Turin is probably not real, so there is no God."

IOW: Standard CRIDer Strawman.

[the_Watchman]

Yes, "vestigial organs" were used as supporting evidence. In my high school anthropology class in 1968, vestigial organs were used as a supporting evidence to demonstrate the viability of evolutionary theory. I remember vividly the instructor pointing a fold in his ear and claiming that it was a vestigial "gill".

The point is that evolutionists engage in "wishful thinking" in cases where they claim it is good science. Their science "evolves".