Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trashcanbred

It would be quite a surprise to find external flesh fossilized at all. We have a very few skin fossils (imprints) of that age, none of which (if memory serves) have associated fossil flesh.

I suspect if wrong I will be soundly corrected.


174 posted on 02/18/2006 9:36:45 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: b_sharp

No you are correct. To my knowledge the only thing close to flesh from that age is imprints. And they are very rare.


236 posted on 02/19/2006 12:34:07 PM PST by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson