Posted on 02/15/2006 11:14:29 AM PST by excludethis
Anything with the byline "Michael Isikoff" need be first considered as anti-Bush propaganda. Not that I'm much of a Bush defender, but the Isikoff articles are almost 100% made to instruct the liberal establishment how to disregard inconvenient revelations.
Vee know nussing, vee see nussing, vee hear nussing.
Loftus himself said
last night
on the John Batchelor program
that two administration officials were not pleased
that these tapes were to be released.
It is a bit puzzling why this should be.
After the whole
Libby imbroglio
I do not know
what "administration official" means anymo'
This article is the reason for the existence of the blogosphere.
Yes. And unnamed sources are very useful in this type of denial story.
The key word here is "stockpiles". WMD have been found. One single IED had an estimated 8 million lethal doses of Sarin. Fortunately, it was not deployed correctly and no one was seriously injured by the Sarin.
But clearly Iraq had the capability to take out a city the size of Washington DC, given the right delivery system.
What's also incredible is that our MSM is trying to protect Saddam Hussein while simultaneously trying to bring down the Vice-President during a time of war.
-PJ
CSPAN -2 , 3:15 ET (now)
Tierney on Plasma from Saturday am
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.