Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physicist to Present New Exact Solution of Einstein's Gravitational Field Equation [Anti-Gravity!]
PhysOrg.com ^ | 11 February 2006 | Staff

Posted on 02/11/2006 4:31:06 PM PST by PatrickHenry

On Tuesday, Feb. 14, noted physicist Dr. Franklin Felber will present his new exact solution of Einstein's 90-year-old gravitational field equation to the Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF) in Albuquerque. The solution is the first that accounts for masses moving near the speed of light.

New antigravity solution will enable space travel near speed of light by the end of this century, he predicts.

Felber's antigravity discovery solves the two greatest engineering challenges to space travel near the speed of light: identifying an energy source capable of producing the acceleration; and limiting stresses on humans and equipment during rapid acceleration.

"Dr. Felber's research will revolutionize space flight mechanics by offering an entirely new way to send spacecraft into flight," said Dr. Eric Davis, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin and STAIF peer reviewer of Felber's work. "His rigorously tested and truly unique thinking has taken us a huge step forward in making near-speed-of-light space travel safe, possible, and much less costly."

The field equation of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity has never before been solved to calculate the gravitational field of a mass moving close to the speed of light. Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

Felber's calculations show how to use the repulsion of a body speeding through space to provide the enormous energy needed to accelerate massive payloads quickly with negligible stress. The new solution of Einstein's field equation shows that the payload would 'fall weightlessly' in an antigravity beam even as it was accelerated close to the speed of light.

Accelerating a 1-ton payload to 90 percent of the speed of light requires an energy of at least 30 billion tons of TNT. In the 'antigravity beam' of a speeding star, a payload would draw its energy from the antigravity force of the much more massive star. In effect, the payload would be hitching a ride on a star.

"Based on this research, I expect a mission to accelerate a massive payload to a 'good fraction of light speed' will be launched before the end of this century," said Dr. Felber. "These antigravity solutions of Einstein's theory can change our view of our ability to travel to the far reaches of our universe."

More immediately, Felber's new solution can be used to test Einstein's theory of gravity at low cost in a storage-ring laboratory facility by detecting antigravity in the unexplored regime of near-speed-of-light velocities.

During his 30-year career, Dr. Felber has led physics research and development programs for the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Department of Energy and Department of Transportation, the National Institute of Justice, National Institutes of Health, and national laboratories. Dr. Felber is Vice President and Co-founder of Starmark.

Source: Starmark [Felber's own firm, apparently]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: cosmology; gravity; physics; podkletnov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-223 next last
To: PatrickHenry
elber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

Cool, sounds like it also makes it harder to get into high speed collisions.

61 posted on 02/11/2006 5:21:34 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
way wait
62 posted on 02/11/2006 5:21:38 PM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99; kentj; PatrickHenry
This article was posted next year.

LOL!

Ah Dam Bubba now what ya gonna do with all them hoods?

From one of your threads the other day. It just cracks me up!!

63 posted on 02/11/2006 5:22:46 PM PST by phantomworker (COURAGE is not the lack of fear, but knowing there is something more important.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: burzum

Sure, they've got some proof. I think the idea of mass causing a curvature of spacetime is certainly something that has been observed, but Einstein did more than come up with that idea. He also came up with specific mathematical equations that he asserted represented the manner in which spacetime was curved. Those equations have not been fully tested, and that is why they sent up the sattelite. If those equations are off just slightly, then this guy's calculations might be useless.


64 posted on 02/11/2006 5:24:12 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Certainly no fun for anyone on the ground.


65 posted on 02/11/2006 5:24:21 PM PST by Noumenon (Liberal activist judges - out of touch, out of tune, but not out of reach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Assuming this guy is right there is still the time dilation problem. Time would move much faster on Earth than on the spacecraft buzzing along at near the speed of light. So we get to launch it but never get to see it return. That's no fun.


66 posted on 02/11/2006 5:24:50 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
"You've already considered this, right? "

Of course, my dear.

An unmentioned complication appears to be finding these conveniently accelerated stars, and then getting in front of them.

It rather sounds like the setup line to an old Red Skelton Gertrude and 'Eathcliffe seagull joke.

"Say, Gertrude?"

"Yeth?" *Pause for laughter*

"Does it seem to you that we are traveling very, very fast?"

"If you thee that thteam locomotive coming up behind uth, you'll put on a burtht of thpeed too!" *cue laugh track*

67 posted on 02/11/2006 5:25:09 PM PST by NicknamedBob (Well, we had Uncle Joe. Then we had our Uncle Ho. Now it looks like we have an Uncle Mo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
You wonder why the Klingons have not paid us a visit, then.

Congratulations - you just rediscovered an important scientific question! It's called Fermi's Paradox.

68 posted on 02/11/2006 5:26:58 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968
Thing is, I've heard of air brakes but not space brakes.
69 posted on 02/11/2006 5:28:13 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; VadeRetro; Physicist
Additionally, as you've already pointed out, particle accelerators routinely accelerate particles well past 0.577c, so this effect should have already been seen in the lab for years if it were true.

Also, when particles are made to collide, they're definitely moving faster than the "Felber point," so if they were each putting out an anti-gravity beam, the results of their collision would be way different than what's predicted -- and routinely observed. Or ... maybe this accounts for what's observed, but in a totally different way. I can't handle that speculation.

70 posted on 02/11/2006 5:28:35 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

bump for later.


71 posted on 02/11/2006 5:29:19 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If the USA was the Roman Empire, Islam would have ceased to be a problem on 9/12/2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

"I don't wee any flying cars. Why?"

Because flying cars don't have any tires to wee on, dummy.


72 posted on 02/11/2006 5:29:40 PM PST by Fatuncle (Were I not ignorant, I would not come here to learn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
Who's panicking?

I'm on my 3rd gargleblaster.

73 posted on 02/11/2006 5:29:51 PM PST by bikepacker67 (Islam was born of Hagar the whore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
He isn't a quack. His research interests have a huge span, but this work is in line with his formal training - his doctoral thesis was entitled, New Class of Exact Solutions of the Dirac Equation in Electromagnetic Fields - Scattering of Charged Klein Gordon and Dirac Wave Packets in a Plane-Background Geometry.

There are two related papers of his in the arXiv, http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505098 entitled Weak 'Antigravity' Fields in General Relativity and http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505099, entitled Exact Relativistic 'Antigravity' Propulsion (both from mid-2005). The arXiv is free access (warning: the appearance on the arXivs does NOT mean an article has been peer reviewed).

74 posted on 02/11/2006 5:30:16 PM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
It can't work like that. As I understand it (at a primitive level) particle accelerators have to keep on chugging to move stuff up close to lightspeed. This effect, if real, should have been detected by now.

The gravitational effects of a subatomic particle are not of any measurable size. Doesn't matter if you're talking gravitational, or anti-gravitational. You need a planetary-size mass moving at close to the speed of light

75 posted on 02/11/2006 5:32:06 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; longshadow
I don't see what's wrong with your point. Wonder what Felber would say?
76 posted on 02/11/2006 5:32:43 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: boris

Ping


77 posted on 02/11/2006 5:33:07 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (John 6: 31-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; Physicist
Sorry, should've given you a courtesy ping in Post 16...

:-( :-( :-(

I'm a bad kitty.

78 posted on 02/11/2006 5:33:15 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona

My point is slightly different from Fermi's. Fermi was trying to answer the question of whether there is life in other parts of the galaxy. He assumed that if there were, then they'd be able to get here. So where are they?

I assume there is life out there. It's not quite so clear to me, though, that they can get here. Even getting to the nearest star would take centuries with any conceivable advances in science that we might imagine. And certainly, there is no life in that solar system, since it's a double system.

If this guy is right, though, then clearly they could get here, so where are they?


79 posted on 02/11/2006 5:33:22 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Lancer_N3502A
Pretty cool. But THIS is what I really want...


80 posted on 02/11/2006 5:33:48 PM PST by BlueOneGolf (I Ride and I Vote. Join me in the American Motorcycle Association today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson