I've made no argument for open borders. You on the other hand have made the argument that there was no reason for Reagan to put troops on the border during the years 1981 thru 1988.
If you feel that the argument that you've made mischaracterizes you point-of-view then you can clarify your point-of-view by answering the following simple question.
Yes, or no, was Ronald Reagan wrong for not putting troops on the border during his presidency?
Steller der Landesverräter, ja oder nein.
This will be my last post to you, as you can't seem to comprehend the "nuance" between Reagan's term and Bush's. I will be ignoring any and all future responses from you.
This is quite boring.
Let me make it real simple:
1. There was no terrorist attack on American soil in which 3,000 American lives were lost during Reagan's term, and NO ONE took it seriously until 9/11.
2. Since 9/11, the borders are STILL wide open and just as we've predicted-- terrorists are coming across (the stories below prove this)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1519110/posts
"Congresswoman: Three Al Qaeda Caught in U.S. After Crossing Border with Mexico"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1539796/posts
"51 Terrorist Suspects Crossed Border Illegally"