To: csense
Imperfect replication, in and of itself, does not infer evolution...unless you're willing to state that sexual reproduction is incompatible with every other theory out there, including, and not the least of which, creationism.
Sure it does. It is change, regardless of any effect, by reproduction and the forces of nature. Creation is not a theory or law and cannot refuted, accepted, or examined by either science or mathematics. There is no material creation or law of creation to observe. Change can be observed. Creation is a thought of philosophy, it is not a material thing, it is not a fact, there is no evidence, and it is not a law. It is simply unknown which is of philosophy. Philosophy seeks to prove or disprove things unknown, (belief and faith) for which there is no material thing or evidence by observance, argument, debate, and the best logical deduction. Theology is of philosophy.
256 posted on
02/11/2006 7:41:52 AM PST by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: jec41
..another clueless evolution advocate who can't understand a simple argument. What else is new.
272 posted on
02/11/2006 10:41:00 AM PST by
csense
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson