[BeHoldAPaleHorse]

"Like I said, I neither an 'evolutionist' or 'creationist'. I'm no expert in any of them. But, evolution cannot explain the complexity of DNA and the many differences you see of it in nature."

OK, let's look at this statement logically. You state that you are not an expert on this subject--but then proceed to make a statement that requires a very high level of expertise in this subject.

When did "ignorance" suddenly become "an intellectually legitimate point of view?"

[adorno]

When did "ignorance" suddenly become "an intellectually legitimate point of view?" When did "ignorance" suddenly become "an intellectually legitimate point of view?"

So, do you subscribe to the 'theory' that he who makes the first insult is the winner of the argument?

I only discuss a matter with people who know how to reman civil during the discussion.