[connectthedots]

So are you still insisting that you never predicted a verdict in the Dover trial?

I did predict a narrow verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.

I also said on a number of occasions that one can never be sure how a trial will end because a judge can choose to ignore the law.

If you insist I never made such comments; you are the one who is a liar.

[Dimensio]

I did predict a narrow verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.

No, you predicted a very narrow verdict "in favor of the defendants". And then later you denied making such a prediction, continuing your denial even after I referenced your previous post on the matter, claiming that you "did not predict who would win". So if you did not predict who would win, what did you mean when you said "in favor of the defenants"?

So first you predicted a very narrow ruling "in favor of the defendants". Then you denied predicting a verdict in favor of the defendants, and now you claim to have predicted a narrow veridct in favor of the plaintiffs.

Should anyone wonder why I call you a liar?