I can't read the article. Try counting how many "went on to say" phrases there are in the article.
Ooops. No time to respond. I have to go
FREEP A POLL
:-)
Cool, I'll stay up for the replay of Cavuto's show to see him.
Roger Headcock is a terrible fill in host. I opted for Johnny Cash instead.
. . .did not like it however when Cavuto referenced how much Rush earns. It was all light-hearted, of course; but noticed he did not ask 'what-his-name' who followed; and never hear Neal make similar 'light-hearted' observations/comments re the personal wealth of Demrats. . .
. . .as per. . .say, Dianne Feistein. . .or Bill Clinton or Hillary. . .or even Katie Couric. I am sure Leon Pannetta is worth something; but no offers to handle his investments. . .oh well; perhaps I am just round the bend on this. . .but I don't like it, nonetheless that Rush's earning power is always a topic of an interviewer's conversation.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184277,00.html
Scroll down on the right to watch the video...
vintage Rush...he's on fire.
That statement would annoy Rush no end.
I saw it and thought it was lame.
I liked the interview, but Fox did a lousy job because they kept cutting to video clips. While discussing the Muslim riots over the cartoons, 2/3 of the right side of the screen showed the riots. Rush was shown only on the left third of the screen. But it was somewhat difficult to hear him, as Fox chose also to have the sound of the riots being played.
I can't remember the next issue they discussed, but the same thing - Rush had only 1/3 of the screen, while Fox showed video (and again had sound) of the topic being discussed.
Rush was a great guest, and I wish Fox would have given him more respect by just dedicating the screen/audio to HIM, without the supporting video. And Rush showed a lot of class at the end, thanking Cavuto for having him on, stating "I really appreciate it". As if he needs the publicity!
bump