[spunkets]

"I doubt that their is anyone here who does not support the 2nd admendment. However, a persons right to their property, and the regulation of what takes place there by those persons, is just as important.

IT ain't about the 2nd Amend. THe property in question is the employee's car. It ain't yours and you have no right to search it. It wasn't your right in the past, it was NEVER done at all, and it ain't going to be done now. That's property rights!

As far as the 2nd Amendment goes and the employee's right to self defense that's secondary. The motivation for this BS is to take that right away, because the grabbers failed in the legislatures. They don't get to violate the rights of their employees, by intimidation. Intimidation is the tool of a criminal, a petty tyrant.

A parking lot is a friggin' parking lot. It's to park cars. The employer's got no business going through the employees cars whatsoever.

[VanDeKoik]

Sigh.

Again, The parking lot is private property, it is not a public realm. If the employer makes it clear up front that they do not want firearms on their property, and reserves the right to search employees cars when they enter their facility, then they are well within their right as the property owners to do so. Their are many places that do this now. Whatever the reasons are as to why is their own.