So what was inaccurate about the initial sentencing of the scumbag in question by Judge Cashman? Did Cashman not say that he "did not believe in punishment", did he not refute the concept of retribution for such heinous crimes as was committed by the defendant? Was it not an accurate portrayal of Cashman, as a liberal-bleeding-heart more concerned with the sex pervert getting treatment, and less concerned about the impact upon the victim?
Yeah, as I read the article, it sure sounds like they're saying only 60 days jail time... If there were any inaccuracies in the initial report, this article doesn't correct them. All they do is throw ad-hominem attacks at the people offended.