To: FerdieMurphy
Alito during confirmation process said in a death penalty case if 4 others desented he'd desent too as a matter of judical courtasy.
I RESPECT a MAN of his word.
3 posted on
02/03/2006 1:07:35 PM PST by
funkywbr
To: funkywbr
While he may be a man of his word, it's hardly a proper way to interpret a matter of constitutional law. Head count and I'll vote.
9 posted on
02/03/2006 1:09:07 PM PST by
joesbucks
To: funkywbr
Alito during confirmation process said in a death penalty case if 4 others desented [sic] he'd desent [sic] too as a matter of judical [sic] courtasy [sic]. Judicial "courtesy"?
All we heard was "the Constitution" and the "rule of law". Since when was being "courteous" the rally cry of conservatives to get a "conservative" on the bench So Alito places "courtesy" above the rule of law?
Bring back Harriet Miers!
48 posted on
02/03/2006 1:19:31 PM PST by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: funkywbr
Why?? Doesn't he have his own mind?? Just another duck following a line of ducks, I guess.
To: funkywbr
And consider this. The entire court will be able to hear the arguments that this method is a cruel and unusual punishment and then reach a final decision. If the full court decides it isn't, then the lower courts will not be allowed to issue stays on those grounds. It would be one less argument the anti death penalty proponents could use to delay executions.
As an aside, I'm very torn on the death penalty myself. It's someting that I have been trying to resolve for nearly 20 years since I was interviewed for a jury in a capital murder case. (I didn't get picked so I didn't have to decide then.)
84 posted on
02/03/2006 1:39:59 PM PST by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: funkywbr
if 4 others desented he'd desent tooFour others?? Just four??
So he'd be the decidin vote ? WTF?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson