Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

England: Religious hate bill goes to vote
BBC ^ | 1/30/06 | BBC

Posted on 01/30/2006 9:04:44 PM PST by freedom44

Thousands of demonstrators are expected outside Parliament as MPs vote on plans to ban incitement to religious hatred.

Ministers want religious groups to have the same protection from hate crimes as racial groups.

The Racial and Religious Hatred Bill has undergone substantial changes in the Lords but the government hopes to push through a compromise amendment.

Critics claim the bill is drawn too widely and could stop free speech and unfairly target artists.

Last year peers voted by a majority of 149 in favour of a cross-bench move to implement freedom of speech safeguards.

These include making sure nobody is found guilty of religious hate crimes unless it is proved they intended to stir up hatred.

They say only "threatening words" should be banned by the bill, not those which are only abusive or insulting.

'Chilling effect'

A coalition of politicians, writers and artists is trying to persuade ministers to accept the changes made by peers.

At a press conference on Monday, comedian Rowan Atkinson, who has been a prominent critic of the bill, said: "No one deserves a right to freedom from criticism."

Government attempts to include an offence of being "reckless" about stirring up hatred could affect performers, he added.

These freedoms to speak and to argue, to criticise and indeed to ridicule, once lost, are very rarely got back

Evan Harris MP

Q&A: Religious hatred law

Conservatives and Liberal Democrats are opposed to the bill, as are some Labour backbenchers.

Labour backbencher Bob Marshall-Andrews said the legislation was "going to have a chilling effect on not just religion but on the whole spectrum of freedom of speech".

He said he did not know how many of his party colleagues would vote against the government but that many would "make their minds up very, very late".

Liberal Democrat human rights spokesman Evan Harris said Tuesday's vote on the bill would be parliament's last chance to protect free speech.

'Freedom to ridicule'

"These freedoms to speak and to argue, to criticise and indeed to ridicule, once lost, are very rarely got back.

Shadow attorney general Dominic Grieve said his party would do "everything it can to work with others in parliament to remove the worst parts of the governments' proposals".

Under the proposed law the offence of inciting racial hatred would carry a maximum prison sentence of seven years.

Sikhs and Jews already have full protection from incitement because the courts regard them as distinct races.

But Christians, Muslims and others are not afforded the same protection because they do not constitute a single ethnic block.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: dhimmi; dhimmitude; england; englanistan; eurabia; fakehatecrimes; freespeech; libertarians; speechgestapo; swine; thoughtpolice; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2006 9:04:45 PM PST by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedom44

There is something unsettling about watching the once great England put a gun to it's own head. They need to declare Islam a dangerous unreligeous ideology incompatable with the Commonwealth, but no, they choose suicide. Prisoners of their own misguided notions to the end.


2 posted on 01/30/2006 9:11:01 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
First Imam that opens his mouth better be locked up.
3 posted on 01/30/2006 9:11:40 PM PST by Dallas59 ((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
At a press conference on Monday, comedian Rowan Atkinson, who
has been a prominent critic of the bill, said: "No one deserves a
right to freedom from criticism."


At least the "Black Adder" is stepping up!
4 posted on 01/30/2006 9:14:52 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
We already have a Racial & Religious Vilification law in Victoria, Australia. It has proven a disaster for the community, an embarrassment for the (Labor) Government, and will undoubtedly be repealed when a change of government comes (hopefully November!)
5 posted on 01/30/2006 9:15:51 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Clear and present danger or incitement should be the standard. Anything less makes claims of supporting freedom of expression meaningless.


6 posted on 01/30/2006 9:18:15 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Should have been called the Islamofascist Protection Bill. Christians will continue to be ridiculed as before without penalty in UK academe and popular culture, but the first time someone speaks out against the moon-god death cultists, it's off to the Old Bailey wit' ya. Undoubtedly the Danish newspaper editorial cartoons would be prosecutable under this legislation. Whither freedom in Britain.


7 posted on 01/30/2006 9:23:34 PM PST by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

No kidding. I won't hold my breath waiting for some radical Imam to get prosecuted under this law.


8 posted on 01/30/2006 9:26:23 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Maybe a reality-sequel called "Big Brother: The Early Years" could be based entirely on domestic news and policy from the UK.


9 posted on 01/30/2006 9:30:27 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

ROFL this is for anglo-celto-british brits! I assume it bans most of the BNP platform from public discourse.


10 posted on 01/30/2006 9:31:56 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
Should have been called the Islamofascist Protection Bill. Christians will continue to be ridiculed as before without penalty in UK academe and popular culture, but the first time someone speaks out against the moon-god death cultists, it's off to the Old Bailey wit' ya. Undoubtedly the Danish newspaper editorial cartoons would be prosecutable under this legislation. Whither freedom in Britain.

I agree 100% History will view this as the beginning of the end. If this passes, then England will be added to my no-travel list.

11 posted on 01/30/2006 10:00:34 PM PST by ozoneliar ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ozoneliar

England is already on my no-travel list. And therein lie my ancestors.


12 posted on 01/30/2006 10:44:55 PM PST by Sender (As water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions. -Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

political correctness is going to be the death of civilized western society.


13 posted on 01/30/2006 11:10:55 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Why should self preservation be called hate crime?


14 posted on 01/30/2006 11:37:16 PM PST by oyez (OK now.. What did I do with those dilithium crystals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

The Brits apparently want to outlaw cartoons that might incite riots by ridiculing radical Islamism. Their attempt to surrender and go the dhimmi way won't solve the problem, though.


15 posted on 01/30/2006 11:59:31 PM PST by familyop ("The Romans and their Empire were but a bauble in comparison to the Jews." --President John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushwacker777; Paleo Conservative

It is a good thing that the Jutland News is printed in Denmark. If they were English, they would soon be sshut down by the PC state.


16 posted on 01/31/2006 12:48:38 AM PST by rmlew (Sedition and Treason are both crimes, not free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Who speaks of liberty while the human mind is in chains? ~Francis Wright

Men fight for freedom, then they begin to accumulate laws to take it away from themselves.


He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself. ~Thomas Paine


17 posted on 01/31/2006 1:39:37 AM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

These kind of laws are racist in the extreme. To say that only people who have a certain religion must be protected form freedom of the press and freedom of expresion is to say that they must be protected from the majority. This is to imply that they are a protected people, and more worthy of support ( and freedom) than the majority.
This kind of legislation is great to protect Pandas and Siberian Tigers, but not thoughts and ideas.


18 posted on 01/31/2006 1:45:56 AM PST by truemiester (If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Unam Sanctam

"Clear and present danger or incitement should be the standard."

Of course, but they've already got Muslims openly calling for the murder of "infidels" and nothing is done to them, or certainly nothing was being done before 9/11. So why are they even bothering with this nonsense?


20 posted on 01/31/2006 2:14:35 AM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson