To: Gordongekko909
I really hope this is because they believe in what the CEO said, and that this isn't being said/done to avoid becoming involved with developers that maybe sued in the future - i.e. lawsuit over eminent domain ties up development projects for months/years, causing potential financial problems.
It really sounds like they mean it though.
4 posted on
01/26/2006 2:23:12 PM PST by
af_vet_rr
To: af_vet_rr
If
Kilo gets overturned, it won't be overturned retroactively. The Court understands how much chaos that would cause, and I assume that this bank's lawyers understand it too.
Based on that, I'd say their motivations are pure.
5 posted on
01/26/2006 2:25:30 PM PST by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson