Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2006 5:48:31 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam
They're going to be too late.....
2 posted on 01/24/2006 5:49:59 PM PST by b4its2late (Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

How long are we, and/or the Israelis going to wait before a strike is made? The longer we wait, the tougher it will be to take them out.


3 posted on 01/24/2006 5:50:52 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
>>>>>At an emergency meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna next week, western countries will seek to report Tehran to the United Nations for possible sanctions<<<<<

Boy, that'll learn 'em....

4 posted on 01/24/2006 5:52:11 PM PST by vrwinger (You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

While the mad mullahs are busy digging tunnels and burying their nukes a mile underground, the Mossad is busy getting their home addresses and travel schedules. This attack will not be on the regime's toys, but on the regime itself. Kill Ahmadinejad and the other nutcases, and there's nobody to order the nukes launched, plus a sane Iranian government might succeed to power.


5 posted on 01/24/2006 5:52:22 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Iran blocking our website, says BBC

(Filed: 25/01/2006)
The Telegraph (UK)

The BBC yesterday accused the Iranian authorities of blocking access to its Persian-language website.

The corporation said use of the site from within Iran had fallen substantially over the past three days and claimed it was being blocked "at the request of the authorities".

Nigel Chapman, director of the BBC World Service, said they were "very concerned" by the development and would request that Teheran reinstated access to BBC services for the Iranian public.

6 posted on 01/24/2006 5:53:34 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Silkworm Missile Suspected in Kuwaiti Blast
Friday, March 28, 2003

The "Silkworm" — believed to be the missile that exploded near a major shopping mall in Kuwait City early Saturday — is a Chinese-made version of the Soviet Styx, a crude but sometimes effective anti-ship missile.

The Silkworm has a 1-ton explosive warhead and a range of about 50 miles. It flies a sea-skimming horizontal course, using an on-board radar guidance system that homes in randomly on the first — or biggest — major ship, building or other target that it picks up.

Patriots — geared against aircraft and high-altitude missiles — probably could not pick a Silkworm up on radar.

Silkworms, or HY-1s, were used during the Iraq-Iran "tanker war" in the Persian Gulf in 1987-88 — but by Iran, not Iraq. An Iranian Silkworm was fired from a launcher in Iraq's Faw peninsula, then occupied by Iran. It hit one of the 11 Kuwaiti oil tankers that had been "reflagged" with the U.S. flag to qualify for U.S. Navy escort through the Gulf.

Kuwait was then backing Baghdad in the Iraq-Iran war that lasted from 1980 to 1988.

The tanker was moored at Kuwait's main coastal terminal, loading oil, when the Silkworm crashed into its bridge, causing massive damage and blinding the American captain. It was the only confirmed incident of a Silkworm hitting a target during the war, although Iran had numerous batteries along its coast, especially in the vital Strait of Hormuz, the entrance to the Gulf.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,82537,00.html

Iran successfully tests surface-to-sea missiles
Iran has successfully tested surface-to-sea missiles with a range of 110 kilometers (68 miles), Iranian state television reported Monday.
The testing of the Silkworm missiles was the most important project of Monday's military maneuvers in southern Iran, the television said.
It said the Silkworms have a speed of 290 kilometers (180 miles) per second and a range of 110 kilometers (68 miles). They can detect targets from a distance of 15 kilometers (9 miles) and have the capacity to destroy a warship.
The report did not say whether the missiles could carry nuclear warheads.
Iran's armed forces began their biggest military maneuvers Friday in national waters in the Sea of Oman and Indian Ocean, close to Pakistan. The drills involved submarines, warships, missiles, jet fighters and gunships.
On Sunday, Iran commissioned its second domestically-built submarine, a vessel that can fire missiles and torpedoes simultaneously.
According to recent reports, Germany has agreed to sell Israel two Dolphin submarines for a deeply discounted price. According to Jane's Defense Weekly, it has the capability to launch cruise missiles with nuclear warheads. Iran produces the Shahab-3 missile, capable of reaching Israel and US forces stationed in the region. Since 1992, it also has produced its own tanks, armored personnel carriers, missiles and a fighter plane


7 posted on 01/24/2006 5:57:35 PM PST by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Am I missing something here? Looks to me like the Khomeiniacs are making tombs for their nuclear scientists. Sounds ok to me.


8 posted on 01/24/2006 5:58:12 PM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The Launch window gets smaller and smaller,
Earth insertion burn in 10, 9, 8, 7, 6,........


9 posted on 01/24/2006 6:04:52 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Wouldn't it be great if we made all this noise about their nuclear sites knowing they would move heaven and earth to protect them at all cost, and all the time we are preparing to move in quickly and occupy their oil fields and associated infrastructure? They would be up the creek without their oil income and that would bring all of their foolishness to quick halt. Presto, we control the flow of oil, thereby calming the oil market and someone else takes over Iran.

Now on the next problem.


11 posted on 01/24/2006 6:10:28 PM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Israel should send it's fabled secret weapon in.


12 posted on 01/24/2006 6:15:02 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Better take that road trip now rather than later.

Either that, or the oil fields will be seized as part of this, and prices might actually drop.


13 posted on 01/24/2006 6:18:14 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

15 posted on 01/24/2006 6:23:34 PM PST by Dallas59 ((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
...to be completed by the beginning of July.

D'OH!

16 posted on 01/24/2006 6:26:22 PM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Well I'm glad that they're "hurrying to defend" nuclear facilities....now all we need to do is analyze the images and real time video to see "increased" activity and blow the crap out of them.

My personal preference is just about 5-6 laser guided munitions in the 1000-2000 pound category for "decapitating" strike with rapid follow up with Strategic Support Branch and the other special operators to kill every engineer/scientist/specialist that we can find.

Let the Israelis take the heat and or credit if they want it otherwise just say it was an "internal insurrection/civil war" between factions in the Iranian leadership.

I'd also hit Syria about 4-5 hours after Iran while everybody is looking at that blood bath, nobody will notice 1-2 explosions that unfortunately killed the Syrian leadership..... just some disgruntled suicide bomber settling a score.

After the Democrats and Muslims unknot their panties we can let them know that maybe we had something to do with it.

It's gonna be a kewl summer.

17 posted on 01/24/2006 6:27:07 PM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The wind up.....

L

26 posted on 01/25/2006 1:18:43 AM PST by Lurker (Liberal policies break hearts and destroy lives, no matter which Party tries them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson