To: TheBrotherhood
"Although the author leaves it to the reader to decide, the evidence is overwhelming that Lady Hope was the sole witness to Darwins' recanting his evolution theory, repentance and back into the arms of Jesus."
And her own words were that he didn't recant. Why are you STILL lying about this? Please explain to us WHY Darwin would have recanted to HER, and not to his wife who worried about his soul? Please explain how this can be logical.
561 posted on
01/25/2006 11:16:20 AM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: CarolinaGuitarman
From your post timestamp doesn't look like you read the entire convincing piece.
Please take the time to read the whole piece and then get back to us, hopefully convinced and converted to the CREV-ID camp.
To: CarolinaGuitarman; TheBrotherhood
These things can certainly happen. Lady Hope may have reawakend Darwin's long dormant faith when no one else had.
Your acceptance of this is NOT NEEDED for its truth to be.
Regards,
Wolf
575 posted on
01/25/2006 12:11:18 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson