Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Filibuster Alito? (Democrats suffer broken backs; Alito hearings blamed)
Townhall.com ^ | Saturday, January 21, 2006 | Robert Novak

Posted on 01/20/2006 11:11:53 PM PST by JohnHuang2

WASHINGTON -- Pressure from liberal activists to oppose confirmation of Judge Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court has been so intense that Democratic senators may be trapped into a filibuster that they do not want to wage -snip- But Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid may not want to risk causing Senate Republican Leader Bill Frist to set a precedent by using the "nuclear" option: to end a filibuster by simple majority vote. Continues...

============================================================

Democrats suffer broken backs; Alito hearings blamed

"The system's kind of broken," says Sen. Joe Biden. The "system" of "kind of" confirmation hearings. But Biden says Biden's not the reason the "system's kind of broken." Or, at least he's not the reason anymore. In fact, stung by criticism of being too long-winded during the John Roberts hearings, Biden whittled each question down this time to only over 20 minutes.

Appearing on NBC's "Today" show last Thursday, Biden complained that "nominees now, Democrat and Republican nominees, come before the United States Congress and resolve not to let the people know what they think about important issues." Biden's tired of nominees showing up donning white baseball caps with "PRINCETON" emblazoned in front, preening for the TV cameras. And yammering endlessly about their grandfather named Finnegan and their daughter at the University of Pennsylvania. The system is totally kinda broken!

Biden's kinda "solution"? Ditch the hearings and "just go to the Senate floor and debate the nominee's statements . . ." Make sure the 'nominee's statements' were the nominee's -- not "borrowed" language, to be sure. But that's it. "Rather than this game."

"We oughta just go straight to the Senate (floor for debate). That's a much better way to do it," Biden told NEWSWEEK.

And to show he really means it, Biden and fellow Judiciary Committee Democrats are keeping Alito's nomination from going to the Senate floor for debate. For at least one week. The press calls this 'Democrats exercising their right to a customary one-week delay .' I call it 'Democrats selecting the date they get defeated.'

Democrats delayed Bush's vote certification, delayed Cabinet appointments, delayed Judges, delayed White House pizza deliveries. So a petty one-week delay on Alito was a bit of a shock.

Specter and Leahy had struck a 'deal' back in November. Specter pushed for hearings in early January. Leahy pushed for hearings in early January, 2009. But January, 2006 it would be, with a vote in Committee on the 17th and an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor days later. Now Dems renege on the deal. One GOP Senator called it a 'breach of trust.' Libbies burn the flag, kill the unborn, appease terrorists, commit treason, shorten sentences for rapists and murderers -- BUT RENEGE ON THEIR WORD?!?

The way the process usually works is that the President announces his nomination. If the President is a Republican, and the nominee is a Republican, the nomination is "controversial." "Controversial" because Ted Kennedy calls the nominee a racist, sexist, homophobic four-legged, two-headed, flame-spewing, green-slimy-scaled monster chowing down on left-handed gay Native-American abortion doctors protesting pRESIDENT Bu$hitler's Dieboldical police state.

Given its heavy media coverage, the hearings are the first and only real chance the racist, sexist, homophobe has to clear his name. But if you're a bed-wetting losercratic clown like Joe Biden, and "Dumbya's" nominees keep handing your butt to you on live TV, scrapping the hearings and going straight for a filibuster on the Senate floor is what you want.

Rather than Judge Alito being the "freak" appointment, the only freak appointments were senators sitting on the Democrat side of the committee.

Seeing how well these hearings have gone for libbies, the Bidenocrats essentially are telling their shriveling base of morons that senators are too incompetent to judge a nominee's competence. Let the press advise and consent.

Instead of taking on the nominee in hearings, Democrats are reverting to basics: Cut and run.

During a full week of "confirmation" hearings, Judge Alito fielded more than 700 penetrating speeches and pontifications from senators. Subjects included extremely hot button issues such as application of H.R. 1646's provisions in sections 408, 616, 621, 633 and 1343 under professor John Yoo's theory of the "unitary executive" (a really tantalizing topic around the water cooler!), under which the President would actually be in charge of the government's Executive Branch -- just because Article II of the Constitution says so; Bush's scandalous decision to allow the NSA to spy on innocent al-Qaeda-Americans; Vanguard; Alito's membership in CAP (Concerned Alumni of Princeton); Vanguard; a job application Alito filled out only over 21 years ago; Vanguard. It was enough to make you leave the hearing room in tears. Of laughter.

Of all the pre-schoolery in last week's Leahy-Kennedy-Biden-Schumer-Durbin laugh-a-thon, the libbie paranoia surrounding Alito's membership in Princeton's now-defunct CAP group got the prize. Are you now, or have you ever been a member of Concerned Alumni of Princeton?, the concerned senators asked, donning their Alumni-foil hats. Never know -- with Alito in the room, NSA-satellite-beamed alien rays, and all that.

Democrats never laid a glove on him. Instead, Alito laid a glum on Democrats. Glum Democrats Can't See Halting Bush on Courts read a New York Times headline. Libbies are so glum, all they can do is watch Brokeback Mountain to keep from leaping from their apartment ledge. Or listen to Al Gore "ROAR" speeches as a sleep aid.

For a whole week, we kept hearing Democrats say how 'troubled' they were, believing this would sink Alito because it's against the law to trouble an endangered species! Despite this, Alito's a shoo-in, and Democrats, walking the planks of the Democrat platform, are still stuck-on-stupid.

Anyway, that's...
My Two Cents...
"JohnHuang2"



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoalitohearings; alitovote; filibuster; novak; senatedems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 01/20/2006 11:11:55 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..

Have a great weekend, y'all, and pray for TomServo.


2 posted on 01/20/2006 11:12:32 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The RINOs have backed Alito. And so has Democrat Ben Nelson. There will be no filibuster.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

3 posted on 01/20/2006 11:14:18 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Prayers for Tom Servo bump


4 posted on 01/20/2006 11:18:16 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Maybe we should refer to them as "Brokeback Dims".


5 posted on 01/20/2006 11:25:26 PM PST by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Great words there Big John. Thanks for the words AND the ping.

Nam Vet

6 posted on 01/20/2006 11:26:17 PM PST by Nam Vet (The Democrat Party of America is perfectly P.C. * .(* P.C. = Patriotically Challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; TomServo
Thanks, for them. (the two cents :) ...AND GET WELL SOON, TOMservo. :D
7 posted on 01/20/2006 11:26:23 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
There will be no filibuster.

I hope you're right, but Republicans have to be prepared to fight for Alito if there is one.
8 posted on 01/20/2006 11:30:13 PM PST by gsrinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"Controversial" because Ted Kennedy calls the nominee a racist, sexist, homophobic four-legged, two-headed, flame-spewing, green-slimy-scaled monster chowing down on left-handed gay Native-American abortion doctors protesting pRESIDENT Bu$hitler's Dieboldical police state

ROTFLMAO, not just me, but Johnny, you made me remember my late Daddy with this one. He was laughing right along with me!

9 posted on 01/20/2006 11:33:18 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gsrinok

There won't be one.


10 posted on 01/20/2006 11:33:51 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

the liberal special interest groups control the dems.

Remember ted kennedy kept judges off the bench because the special interest groups wanted to not let them on to hear the michigan affirmative action case in the 6th circuit.

The special interest groups also said estrada should be blocked in an e-mail to kennedy saying he was dangerous because he was a hispanic.



Republicans let ginsberg through with no fight but these dems have blocked judges after judges.


Nixon had two supreme court judges voted down by the dems and then bork. Then they blocked bush's top conservative appealite nominees.

You want to clear up the corruption in washington stop the influence of these groups.

Ted Kennedy calls commie ralph neas the 101st senator.


11 posted on 01/20/2006 11:36:52 PM PST by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I am always amazed at how the idiot democraps never think how wise it is to piss off a person that is destined to sit on the highest court of the land, by attempting to destroy them in the most twisted personal manner.

Even the most ignorant petty thief of the ghetto knows enough not to piss off the judge. But not the democraps!
12 posted on 01/20/2006 11:36:59 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper (ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I can't believe that watching Brokeback Mountain wouldn't actually make them want to jump off their balconies. Here's hoping anyway.

L

13 posted on 01/20/2006 11:39:04 PM PST by Lurker (You don't let a pack of wolves into the house just because they're related to the family dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
Yes, and when Napoleon drug his troops from Revolutionary France to Russia, HE LOST THE WHOLE DEAL.
14 posted on 01/20/2006 11:42:33 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo
Maybe we should refer to them as "Brokeback Dims".

Well, we have a "Brokeback Mountain" so why not a "Brokeback (Capitol) Hill."

15 posted on 01/20/2006 11:44:38 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Excellent!


16 posted on 01/20/2006 11:49:26 PM PST by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tang-soo

AMEN!


17 posted on 01/21/2006 12:08:37 AM PST by de Buillion (Pedophiles, Perverts, and child sexual predators- It's partytime in Vermont, Y'all come on up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

One of the best taglines that I have EVER seen!


18 posted on 01/21/2006 12:11:48 AM PST by de Buillion (Pedophiles, Perverts, and child sexual predators- It's partytime in Vermont, Y'all come on up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion

TY :)

Yours gave me a good laugh (though sad that it is).


19 posted on 01/21/2006 12:22:12 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

"Make sure the 'nominee's statements' were the nominee's -- not "borrowed" language, to be sure."

Tell that to the MSM!


20 posted on 01/21/2006 12:27:51 AM PST by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson