Skip to comments.Feds want Google search records (part of effort to revive an Internet child protection law)
Posted on 01/18/2006 9:27:48 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
So...porn sites should be accessible to minors?? What am I missing here?
Absolutely right - the government seems to think they have a right to any and all data held by nongovernmental organizations. The allegation is not that they have done anything illigal - they just want to analyze Google's data to see who might have been doing something illegal.
Um, the scholastic records of Mr. Mintz and his editors?
There is only one way to make this content inaccessible to minors and that is to not have it, period. Some companies tried making their websites inaccessible if you didn't have a credit card, by making it so you had to log in, but only allowed to log in if you had a credit card but that didn't work, because alot of kids have credit cards.
We'll see if the Merc edits that little piece.
Oh so now Google is answerable to the govt ?
It's even worse than that -- according to the article, the feds just want the data in order to help them argue a point of law...
This intrusion thing is a slippery slope. Enough already. Don't we have enough problems to work on? Spend the time fixing things in Iraq and with the deficit, and the hundred other things that are going wrong.
How does this type of thing make anyone more secure? It's a bunch of BS. I hope Google prevails. I'd side with the libertarian leaners on this issue.
But it's for the children.
I very much hope this fails for the government. This is like a pre-cognitive crime. "If you don't have anything to hide, why were you searching for the words 'girls tight dresses pigtails', hmm?"
How would this help prosecute the internet sites that are hosted outside of this country?
As much as I disagree with the politics of the founders of Google, this is pretty scary. The search records could be used for any type of snooping. I hope Google stands firm, and I hope the courts do, too.
Are they completely impaired?
Why do they need to subpoena Google's search records to find the content providers? The article says they're after the site owners/content providers. They could just do searches themselves to find the sites, then work with Network Solutions to find out the domain owner info.
I guess the DOJ and WH have some of their search functions disabled or blocked since Clinton left town..
Confidential to the Justice Dept...
Just go to WWW.GOOGLE.COM and search for whatever you wish.
Maybe they think google is hiding the good stuff for themselves? :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.