Replies

I wouldn't say that the abortion position is secondary to
socialist positions, but that they are cut from the same cloth. In both cases, they've used deception and dishonesty to advance their policy agenda, not relying on adherence to democratic ideals in an honest process as a means of ensuring legitimacy of governance, but relying on features of our democratic institutions and tactical maneuver, using institutions as tactical tools to help subvert legitimacy, while delaying and denying electoral tests of the public sentiment, and using radical leftist judges to impose minority policies on the majority. It has taken fifty years to overcome. The question now, really, is what happens looking forward as popular awareness builds that the logjam of fifty years of policy error, in spite of half a century of frenetic mortaring, is leaking badly from its foundations.

Of course, in spite of what the leftists believe, this current result was and is inevitable for no other reason than demographics. It is simply bad politics, on the basis of future numbers, to enable eliminating entire generations of your own most likely future supporters. This, of course, is also why after decades of liberal Democratic control of government we have no control over our borders: When you've enabled aborting entire crops of your own future voters, you have to try to import new ones who will replace them...