To: Graybeard58
The government gives health care to those who won't work, but won't subsidize health care for some of its own employees (myself included).
2 posted on
01/09/2006 11:44:53 AM PST by
Awestruck
(All the usual suspects)
To: Graybeard58
This was printed in Connecticut? With actual ink?
3 posted on
01/09/2006 11:45:29 AM PST by
Jack of all Trades
(Never underestimate the speed in which the thin veneer of civilization can be stripped away.)
To: Graybeard58
I think that at least 6 months ago, the Wall St Journal published stats.
74% owned a washer
two thirds owned at least one car
one third owned a second car
I don't recall the rest. I do recall Ceci Connelly harping on how bad the economy was. That's hard to listen to especially when it was Moynihan who was pilloried when he found that welfare programs backfire.
7 posted on
01/09/2006 12:02:55 PM PST by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
To: Graybeard58
One has to remember that "poverty" as the popular media treat it is measured with respect to the context of the local economy - the poorest 20% are poor by definition and not by a comparison to their counterparts elsewhere in the world or especially elsewhen in history. I noted this last month in rereading Woodham-Smith's
The Great Hunger, which dealt with the Irish famine of the 1840's - prior to the crop failure 2000 Irish starved to death in a "normal" year and nobody turned a hair. And the rest of Europe was no different.
God forbid we should ever see real poverty again in this country because I don't think the country would make it.
To: Graybeard58
From the headline I thought the article was going to say something profound;
Like: What poor people really lack is a decent societal culture.
To: Graybeard58
13 posted on
01/09/2006 9:04:27 PM PST by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson