Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush was denied wiretaps, bypassed them (FISA Court denied them in unprecedented numbers)
UPI ^ | Dec. 27, 2005 | UPI

Posted on 12/27/2005 10:47:23 AM PST by Pragmatic_View

WASHINGTON, Dec. 26 (UPI) -- U.S. President George Bush decided to skip seeking warrants for international wiretaps because the court was challenging him at an unprecedented rate.

A review of Justice Department reports to Congress by Hearst newspapers shows the 26-year-old Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court modified more wiretap requests from the Bush administration than the four previous presidential administrations combined.

The 11-judge court that authorizes FISA wiretaps modified only two search warrant orders out of the 13,102 applications approved over the first 22 years of the court's operation.

But since 2001, the judges have modified 179 of the 5,645 requests for surveillance by the Bush administration, the report said. A total of 173 of those court-ordered "substantive modifications" took place in 2003 and 2004. And, the judges also rejected or deferred at least six requests for warrants during those two years -- the first outright rejection of a wiretap request in the court's history.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abovethelaw; alqaeda; fisa; gwot; heroic; homelandsecurity; nsa; patriotleak; spying; terrorattack; terrorism; wiretap; wiretaps; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-580 next last
I searched and didn't see this posted.

A longer article on the subject:

Secret court modified wiretap requests. Intervention may have led Bush to bypass panel

I posted the UPI article, because it had the numbers.

Apparently the FISA court doesn't know we have been attacked on 9-11-2001 and doesn't care if the terrorists will nuke a US city.

1 posted on 12/27/2005 10:47:23 AM PST by Pragmatic_View
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

This is just astounding.


2 posted on 12/27/2005 10:49:46 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View
Hmmmm......Clinton appointees? Carter appointees? Why would judges reject so many more requests *after* 9/11?
3 posted on 12/27/2005 10:51:05 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

Why didn't Bush say this when he was justifying his actions? He seems to have no interest in defending himself.


4 posted on 12/27/2005 10:51:54 AM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

It would be interesting to know how many on the FISA court are Clinton placements.


5 posted on 12/27/2005 10:52:03 AM PST by Clara Lou (A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

Oh, but there's no bias or hatred towards GWB. None whatsoever!

Wonder if this will make the front page of NYT's? NOT.


6 posted on 12/27/2005 10:52:14 AM PST by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Clinton Appointees.


7 posted on 12/27/2005 10:52:37 AM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

"NSA prides itself on learning the lessons of the 1970s and obeying the legal restrictions imposed by FISA," Bamford said. "Now it looks like we're going back to the bad old days again."


===

I guess they are very proud, that they may have prevented 9-11, but didn't and want to make sure they won't be responsible for preventing a nuke attack on a US city.


8 posted on 12/27/2005 10:52:37 AM PST by Pragmatic_View
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

As they say, the Constitution is not a suicide pact. If the leftists want to commit suicide by jihad, I urge them to buy one-way tickets to Iran.


9 posted on 12/27/2005 10:52:41 AM PST by peyton randolph (<a href="http://clinton.senate.gov/">shrew</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

Good for Bush.


10 posted on 12/27/2005 10:52:46 AM PST by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy

He did defend himself. As usual the Whine All the Time Choir just tunes everything out so they can find the next thing to whine at Bush about


11 posted on 12/27/2005 10:53:47 AM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

No wonder Bush used his Constitutional Authorities rather than the FISA Courts. Any President in their right minds would have done the same thing and skip this sham court.


12 posted on 12/27/2005 10:54:19 AM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy

Because going around the court when it denied your requests isn't exactly a stirring defense. Regardless of how justified it may have been. We always must remember that it's Bush today, Hillary tomorrow.


13 posted on 12/27/2005 10:54:53 AM PST by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

It is isn't it..


14 posted on 12/27/2005 10:55:32 AM PST by Dog ( ABMcM(Anybody but McCain....except Bill Frist))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View
U.S. President George Bush decided to skip seeking warrants for international wiretaps because the court was challenging him at an unprecedented rate.

Great grounds for impeachment.

15 posted on 12/27/2005 10:56:35 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View
Something steenks at Justice??


16 posted on 12/27/2005 10:56:44 AM PST by xcamel (a system poltergeist stole it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View
Bush needs to protect us. Are the courts going to take responsibility for the next attack? NO, just like they take no responsibility for letting rapists and child molesters walk the streets to attack us again.
17 posted on 12/27/2005 10:57:15 AM PST by tioga (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT

2005 Membership

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was created by section 103(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(a)). It was originally comprised of seven district judges from seven circuits named by the Chief Justice of the United States to serve a maximum of 7 years.

In 2001, the U.S.A. Patriot Act (section 208) amended the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to increase the number of FIS Court judges from seven to eleven, "of whom no fewer than 3 shall reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia." The membership of the Court in 2004 was as follows.

Appointed Expires
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, Colleen (Presiding) D.D.C. 5/19/02 5/18/2009
BENSON, Dee D.Utah 5/2004 5/2011
BROOMFIELD, Robert C. D.Ariz. 10/01/02 5/18/2009
CARR, James G. N.D.OH 5/19/02 5/18/2008
CONWAY, John E. D.N.M. 5/19/02 5/18/2007
DAVIS, Michael J. D.Minn. 5/18/99 5/18/2006
GORTON, Nathaniel M. D.Mass. 5/18/01 5/18/2008
HILTON, Claude M. E.D.Va. 5/18/01 5/18/2007
HOWARD, Malcolm N.C. 2005 2012
KAZEN, George P. S.D.Tex. 5/18/03 5/18/2010
ROBERTSON, James D.D.C. 5/19/02 5/18/2006



FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT OF REVIEW

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review was created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to review applications that were denied by the FIS Court. The Court of Review is comprised of three judges, one of whom is designated as the presiding judge, named by the Chief Justice of the United States from the U.S. district or appellate courts. Judges serve a maximum of seven years and are not eligible for redesignation.

Appointed Expires
GUY, Ralph B. (Presiding) Sixth Circuit
to Presiding
10/08/1998
5/18/2001
5/18/2005
5/18/2005
LEAVY, Edward Ninth Circuit 9/25/2001 5/18/2008
WINTER, Ralph K. Jr. Second Circuit 5/18/2003 5/18/2010



Source: U.S. Department of Justice



*****The members are appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

18 posted on 12/27/2005 10:57:15 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff

I am glad they went around the court...my family is safer because they did......now besides the DEMS we have 11 freaking judges trying to stop us from catching the bad guys.


19 posted on 12/27/2005 10:57:31 AM PST by Dog ( ABMcM(Anybody but McCain....except Bill Frist))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

When people bring up the Contstitution, that's a red herring.

The entire wiretapping was unrestricted until 26 years ago, when Congress made a law and created FISA, as a knee jerk reaction to the wiretapping of the Nixon adminstration. Is anyone going to claim that prior to that, for some 200 years the Constitution was ignored?

This is an unintended consequence of that law, and if Congress had any backbone and some other appropriate body parts, they would change the law to make it easy to catch terrorists, instead of handcuffing our President and intelligence agencies, making it virtually impossible for them, to find out about imminent attacks, once the terrorists are already in place, in the US. How idiotic is that?!


20 posted on 12/27/2005 10:58:01 AM PST by Pragmatic_View
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-580 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson