Thank you. I, too, am greatly annoyed at some people's tendencies to tell me that my personal choices are "immoral". Whether it's the Buchanan crowd telling me who I can or can't have sex with, or the NAACP telling me who I can or can't (or must) hire, I believe that the attempt by third parties to interfere with the choices of rational, intelligent, mutually consenting adults is simply ignorant, and definitively non-conservative.
(And, no, I myself am not part of a swinger's club, though I don't care who is or isn't. I don't consider a person "liberated" just for being a member of one, nor do I consider a person "righteous" just for NOT being a member of one.)
Were you "greatly annoyed" when David Westerfield killed Danielle VanDam?
Amen. My personal problem is with the Buchanobots and boycott brigade telling me what I should by.
Then again, they don't have the force of law behind them. Its the folks in DC and Olympia that I would be concerned about.
James 5:19 "My brothers, if one of you should wander from the truth and someone should bring him back, 20 remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the error of his way will save him from death and cover over a multitude of sins."
Obeying the teachings of God in the Bible isn't non-conservative.
Thank you. I, too, am greatly annoyed at some people's tendencies to tell me that my personal choices are "immoral". Whether it's the Buchanan crowd telling me who I can or can't have sex with, or the NAACP telling me who I can or can't (or must) hire, I believe that the attempt by third parties to interfere with the choices of rational, intelligent, mutually consenting adults is simply ignorant, and definitively non-conservative.
"(And, no, I myself am not part of a swinger's club, though I don't care who is or isn't. I don't consider a person "liberated" just for being a member of one, nor do I consider a person "righteous" just for NOT being a member of one.)"
Can ANYONE tell me watnl THIS means?