What does a singular court decision based on one poorly crafted book have to do with deciding the fallacy of ID?
Intelligent design has nothing to do with evolution or creationism.
I responded:
Not factually correct. Didn't you read the court transcript which showed the Panda book originally had "creation" in numerous places, but after the Supreme Court Edwards decision in 1987 a global search and replace was made to insert "intelligence"? ...
Now you respond:
What does a singular court decision based on one poorly crafted book have to do with deciding the fallacy of ID?
I demonstrated a connection between ID and creationism. I did not attempt to demonstrate a "fallacy" or any such.
I merely responded to your claim "Intelligent design has nothing to do with evolution or creationism" with evidence to the contrary.