To: ironman
D'OH!
The prohibition of aiding the enemy is not conditioned on whether the enemy actually benefits from the aid on a given traitor's schedule.
D'OH!
2 posted on
12/22/2005 5:20:24 AM PST by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: Publius6961
3 posted on
12/22/2005 5:22:01 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Publius6961; Peach; ironman
Then why did the Washington Post's twin sister report on this leak?
NBC News investigative producer Robert Windrem has tracked bin Ladens activities since the mid-1990s. For a time, he used satellite phones, but that ended after a leak revealed that the U.S. was listening in.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/627355.asp?cp1=1
8 posted on
12/22/2005 5:35:46 AM PST by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: Publius6961
The prohibition of aiding the enemy is not conditioned on whether the enemy actually benefits from the aid on a given traitor's schedule.Shhh...
Don't tell anyone, but I heard that the US is getting ready to invade Iwo Jima on their way to kicking Tojo's butt.
</sarcasm>
46 posted on
12/22/2005 4:00:04 PM PST by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(Karen Ryan reporting...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson