Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What a crock.
1 posted on 12/21/2005 6:46:34 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: steve-b

Congress. Out of it's depth on technical matters.


2 posted on 12/21/2005 6:48:42 AM PST by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b

Now maybe they can get to work on a law protecting us from all the BS out of Washington.


3 posted on 12/21/2005 6:50:43 AM PST by sheltonmac (QUIS CUSTODIET IPSOS CUSTODES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b
cited as evidence that a law enacted two years ago is working.

Not to pee on their parade or anything...but the law is what you could kindly call a joke. The fight against spam is not going to be stopped by some feel-good legislation. Now if the FTC were to seriously go after the spammers, that might make a difference...but so far they have not done so. Yes, there has been a case or two in the news but that is about it. When the spammer gives you either their address or the address of the business they are spamming for...how hard is it to go after them?
5 posted on 12/21/2005 6:53:30 AM PST by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b

Crime has more or less leveled off too. Proof positive gun control works.

/sarcasm off.


6 posted on 12/21/2005 6:56:00 AM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b
But the number is leveling off, which federal officials on Tuesday cited as evidence that a law enacted two years ago is working.

That must by why I deleted only 400 or so spam messages from my work e-mail on Monday.

13 posted on 12/21/2005 7:11:32 AM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b

The male enhancement messages must have been exempted by Congress, probably because they need it.


14 posted on 12/21/2005 7:17:02 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b

You can forward spam e-mails to the Feds at Spam@uce.gov


15 posted on 12/21/2005 7:20:57 AM PST by Bender2 (Even dirty old robots need love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b
FTC Says Federal Spam Law Has Worked

I always liked Federal cheese.

I've never had Federal spam.

17 posted on 12/21/2005 7:34:04 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Over it is not, until over it is." -- Yoda Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: steve-b
What a crock.

You are too nice. I still average about 50 spams a day on three seperate email addresses, despite having multiple spam filters. About half of them are from off-shore and do not comply with the "opt out" provision in the Federal Law. The other half are domestic, and while they comply with Federal Law, the burden is on me to spend/waste the time "unsubscribing" to something that I never subscribed to in the first place.

19 posted on 12/21/2005 9:11:32 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson