Skip to comments.
Clinton Claimed Authority to Order No-Warrant Searches
(Does anyone remember that?)
National Review ^
| Byron York
Posted on 12/20/2005 7:55:51 AM PST by SueRae
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: Christian4Bush
To: thoughtomator
You'll definitely want to check out the Clinton Downside Legacy. Bookmarked and BUMPed, with my thanks.
42
posted on
12/20/2005 8:58:35 AM PST
by
Christian4Bush
("The only 'new tone' we hear should be that of the Left's telephone being disconnected. " dogcaller)
To: SueRae
When do we bring out the miniature flip flops again? LOL!! Friggin anti-American liberal POS media!!!!
To: Peach; Mo1; Sam Hill; hipaatwo; kcvl; Ernest_at_the_Beach
"The Department of Justice believes, and the case law supports, that the president has inherent authority to conduct warrantless physical searches for foreign intelligence purposes," Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on July 14, 1994, "and that the President may, as has been done, delegate this authority to the Attorney General." Oh, the irony!
44
posted on
12/20/2005 9:20:47 AM PST
by
Howlin
(Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
To: Howlin
Oh Geez ... where is the popcorn .. *L*
45
posted on
12/20/2005 9:26:04 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: thoughtomator
46
posted on
12/20/2005 9:26:14 AM PST
by
Just A Nobody
(I - LOVE - my attitude problem! WBB lives on. Beware the Enemedia.)
To: BostonianRightist
Just because JFK did it, Clinton did and Bush does it (those are three articles I've read), doesn't mean it's Constitutional.Oh yes it is, unless and until the US Supreme Court rules otherwise.
The problem, you see, is that neither you nor any member of Congress, nor the MSM get to make that determination.
47
posted on
12/20/2005 9:28:28 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: hipaatwo
48
posted on
12/20/2005 9:30:32 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: SueRae
So who/what did Toon use it on? Inquiring minds want to know...
49
posted on
12/20/2005 9:31:15 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: SueRae
50
posted on
12/20/2005 9:32:02 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: King of Florida
"Clinton did it" is a pretty sorry rationale for government spying on American citizens. Clinton did a lot of things that shouldn't have been done.Back to Logic101.
You miss the argument entirely; no is is arguing that because so and so did it...
What is being asked, rightfully so, is that if it is so Constitutionally critical, why didn't all the present critics (traitors) challenge the practice then?
They were then either incompetent or complicit.
51
posted on
12/20/2005 9:32:17 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: mewzilla
And what did soon-to-be presidential candidate Hilliary Clinton know about those searches and when did she know it...?
52
posted on
12/20/2005 9:33:23 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Mo1
That's what I read to my mom but left out Clintons name until the end. LOL
53
posted on
12/20/2005 9:33:39 AM PST
by
hipaatwo
To: Sacajaweau; Howlin; kcvl
I thought I heard Pelosi say that Rockefeller never actually sent the July 17 2003 letter to Cheney. I'll check when I come back...unless someone wants to be diligent for me. :-) If you find it .. could you please ping me?
54
posted on
12/20/2005 9:34:00 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: mewzilla
And what did soon-to-be presidential candidate Hilliary Clinton know about those searches and when did she know it...?Question for the Dems: Excreting a brick yet?
You will be.
55
posted on
12/20/2005 9:34:25 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: rhombus
I don't know the answer but it's interesting to think about.What's there to think about?
56
posted on
12/20/2005 9:34:51 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
To: SueRae
Every President in my LIFETIME has issued an Executive Order authorizing warrantless searches for enemy agents and their associates.
This whole PRESIDENT BROKE THE LAW crowd are digging a hole they may never escape from.
Here is HOPING like hell that the AG starts an investigation to get the NY Times to divulge THEIR SOURCE for this infomration and hang the traitor that released Top Secret information to the press.
Wanna bet it is a SENATOR?.........Anyone?
57
posted on
12/20/2005 9:35:10 AM PST
by
PISANO
(We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
Comment #58 Removed by Moderator
Comment #59 Removed by Moderator
To: Celtman
many conservatives have the misconceptions that the Constitution does not apply to foreigners in the US, and ... Silliest thing I ever heard.
Please cite any documented applications of Constitutional rights, or even discussion about it, against foregn combatants in, say, the War of 1812.
Please take your time and don't change the subject.
60
posted on
12/20/2005 9:39:59 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson